Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2011 12:15:51 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#640496: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #409069,
regarding whitelister: not documented well enough
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
409069: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=409069
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: whitelister
Version: 0.8-4
The file /usr/share/doc/whitelister/README.gz describes the syntax for
whitelister.conf, but does not explain what whitelister does with them.
For example:
(2) Rules Configuration
-------------------
rbl hostname of a rbl service
Ok, what happens if there are two different "rbl"s and the client IP
is in one of them but not in the other. Is the IP whitelisted?
Are the rbls "and"ed or they are "or"ed?
Thanks.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.8-5+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package whitelister has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/640496
The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.
This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[email protected].
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---
