Your message dated Sat, 05 Nov 2011 17:36:15 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#647715: libjack0: installing libjack wants to remove
jackd2 jackd2-firewire libjack-jackd2-0 libjack-jackd2-dev
has caused the Debian Bug report #647715,
regarding libjack0: installing libjack wants to remove jackd2 jackd2-firewire
libjack-jackd2-0 libjack-jackd2-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
647715: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=647715
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libjack0
Severity: normal
Doing e.g.
apt-get install libjack0
This also applies to the -dev version of the library
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sa, Nov 05, 2011 at 17:02:10 (CET), Lorenzo wrote:
> Package: libjack0
> Severity: normal
>
> Doing e.g.
>
> apt-get install libjack0
>
> This also applies to the -dev version of the library
That's by design and intended. You need to decide if you want to use
jackd1 (with package libjack0) or jackd2 (with package
libjack-jackd2-0). Both are mostly ABI compatible except for packages
that use implementation details that aren't shared.
Cheers,
Reinhard
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4
--- End Message ---
