Your message dated Mon, 26 Sep 2005 18:36:52 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libtool: some options available in documentation are not
usable under AMD64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Aug 2005 10:09:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 28 03:09:35 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from relay01s.ntr.oleane.net [194.2.3.145]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E9K6Z-0003HO-00; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 03:09:35 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([212.234.111.145])
by relay01s.ntr.oleane.net with ESMTP id j7S9jkiR028956;
Sun, 28 Aug 2005 11:45:48 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Benoit Hamet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libtool: some options available in documentation are not usable under
AMD64
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 12:09:30 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: libtool
Version: 1.5.6-6
Severity: normal
Hi,
I found that on AMD64 (I can't test it under other plateform) the
-static and -all-static options are rejected by libtools as
"unrecognized option `-static'"
but libtool --help list them as valid ones ... so what happens ?
regards,
Benoit.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-9-amd64-k8
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages libtool depends on:
ii autotools-dev 20050803.1 Update infrastructure for config.{
ii cpp 4:4.0.1-3 The GNU C preprocessor (cpp)
ii file 4.12-1 Determines file type using "magic"
ii gcc [c-compiler] 4:4.0.1-3 The GNU C compiler
ii gcc-3.3 [c-compiler] 1:3.3.6-9 The GNU C compiler
ii gcc-3.4 [c-compiler] 3.4.4-7 The GNU C compiler
ii gcc-4.0 [c-compiler] 4.0.1-5 The GNU C compiler
ii libc6-dev [libc-dev] 2.3.5-4 GNU C Library: Development Librari
Versions of packages libtool recommends:
ii libltdl3-dev 1.5.6-6 A system independent dlopen wrappe
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 325387-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Sep 2005 16:36:56 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 26 09:36:56 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from hoboe2bl1.telenet-ops.be [195.130.137.73]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EJvyK-0006SD-00; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 09:36:56 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by hoboe2bl1.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP
id 0C7FA38307; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 18:36:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775F4A.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.74])
by hoboe2bl1.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP
id C208138303; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 18:36:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id 24D7B26136; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 18:36:52 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 18:36:52 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Benoit Hamet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: libtool: some options available in documentation are not usable
under AMD64
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 06:31:14PM +0200, Benoit Hamet wrote:
>
>
> >
> > So something like "libtool --mode=link gcc -all-static ..." works
> > as it should. But "libtool --mode=link -all-static gcc ..." does
> > not and maybe it should.
>
> Ok, I guess that's it ... but I guess too that the line after gcc is
> passed "as is" so inverting the options is not a good idea. And still
> guessing and perhaps wrong, the default behavior of libtool was linking
> with gcc so a libtool -static was working like a charm, when new version
> need implicit specification of "--mode=link gcc" ...
-all-static is not a valid option for gcc, nor are alot of
others, and libtool will convert those to the proper one.
> Ok for me if you want to close it...
Closing it.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
