Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2011 17:20:51 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#648972: xulrunner-9.0: Unversioned xulrunner package
has caused the Debian Bug report #648972,
regarding xulrunner-9.0: Unversioned xulrunner package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
648972: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=648972
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xulrunner-9.0
Version: 9.0~a2+20111104042026-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi there!
I was wondering if we can have an unversioned meta-package for
xulrunner.
I tought of that when I upgraded my iceweasel and now I must keep
xulrunner-7.0 or bellow to have tuxguitar package working, since it
depends on that versions of xulrunner. Besides that, the package
xul-ext-adblock-plus must be updated everytime xulrunner is, which
forces one to decide between upgrading browser or removing
adblock-plus.
Thanks in advance.
All of the best, Alexandre
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (700, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages xulrunner-9.0 depends on:
ii libasound2 1.0.24.1-4
ii libatk1.0-0 2.2.0-2
ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.5-7
ii libc6 2.13-21
ii libcairo2 1.10.2-6.1
ii libdbus-1-3 1.4.16-1
ii libevent-1.4-2 1.4.14b-stable-1
ii libfontconfig1 2.8.0-3
ii libfreetype6 2.4.7-2
ii libgcc1 1:4.6.1-15
ii libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 2.24.0-1
ii libglib2.0-0 2.28.8-1
ii libgtk2.0-0 2.24.7-1
ii libhunspell-1.3-0 1.3.2-4
ii libjpeg8 8c-2
ii libmozjs9d 9.0~a2+20111104042026-1
ii libnotify4 0.7.4-1
ii libnspr4-0d 4.8.9-1
ii libnss3-1d 3.12.11-3
ii libpango1.0-0 1.29.4-2
ii libpixman-1-0 0.22.2-1
ii libreadline6 6.2-7
ii libsqlite3-0 3.7.7-2
ii libstartup-notification0 0.12-1
ii libstdc++6 4.6.1-15
ii libvpx0 0.9.7.p1-2
ii libx11-6 2:1.4.4-2
ii libxext6 2:1.3.0-3
ii libxrender1 1:0.9.6-2
ii libxt6 1:1.1.1-2
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3
xulrunner-9.0 recommends no packages.
Versions of packages xulrunner-9.0 suggests:
ii libcanberra0 0.28-3
ii libdbus-glib-1-2 0.98-1
ii libgnomeui-0 2.24.5-2
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 01:15:37PM -0200, Alexandre Lymberopoulos wrote:
> Package: xulrunner-9.0
> Version: 9.0~a2+20111104042026-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi there!
>
> I was wondering if we can have an unversioned meta-package for
> xulrunner.
>
> I tought of that when I upgraded my iceweasel and now I must keep
> xulrunner-7.0 or bellow to have tuxguitar package working, since it
> depends on that versions of xulrunner.
Unfortunately, there are a lot of things that each new version of
xulrunner break, and as such, having a generic "xulrunner" doesn't work.
It's like having a generic "libraw1394" package for libraw1394-11 and
libraw1394-8 (just took a random example). It doesn't work.
> Besides that, the package
> xul-ext-adblock-plus must be updated everytime xulrunner is, which
> forces one to decide between upgrading browser or removing
> adblock-plus.
It shouldn't be a problem. If it is, then there is something wrong with
addblock-plus itself and/or its package.
Mike
--- End Message ---
