Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:00:20 -0600
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#648981: r-base: Please mention how to install 
unpackaged R libraries and R packages
has caused the Debian Bug report #648981,
regarding r-base: Please mention how to install unpackaged R libraries and R 
packages
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
648981: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=648981
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: r-base
Version: 2.14.0-1
Severity: wishlist

Dear Debian folks,


wanting to use `rbenchmark` which is a lot of times mentioned in the
posts of Dirk’s blog [1] what is the recommended way. Could that be
documented please? That would be quite useful. At least for me.

The description of the package already states the following.

        Additionally, over thousand extension "packages" are available from 
CRAN, the
        Comprehensive R Archive Network, many also as Debian packages, named
        'r-cran-<name>'.

Would the following addition be useful?

        If they are not you have to manually install them using
        `install.packages()`.

Adding that to `README.Debian` would also be helpful in my opinion.

The main question then is though, what happens if that manually
installed packages suddently is packaged for Debian?


Thanks a million,

Paul


[1] http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com/blog/

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages r-base depends on:
ii  r-base-core    2.14.0-1
ii  r-recommended  2.14.0-1

Versions of packages r-base recommends:
ii  r-base-html  2.14.0-1
ii  r-doc-html   2.14.0-1

Versions of packages r-base suggests:
pn  ess                     <none>
pn  r-doc-info | r-doc-pdf  <none>

-- no debconf information

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 16 November 2011 at 17:17, Paul Menzel wrote:
| Package: r-base
| Version: 2.14.0-1
| Severity: wishlist
| 
| Dear Debian folks,
| 
| 
| wanting to use `rbenchmark` which is a lot of times mentioned in the
| posts of Dirk’s blog [1] what is the recommended way. Could that be
| documented please? That would be quite useful. At least for me.

That is basic R usage,  see e.g. the 'R Installation and Administration'
manual that comes with R (and which Debian provides to you in the packages

       r-doc-pdf         pdf versions
       r-doc-html
       r-doc-info        texinfo verions
 
| The description of the package already states the following.
| 
|         Additionally, over thousand extension "packages" are available from 
CRAN, the
|         Comprehensive R Archive Network, many also as Debian packages, named
|         'r-cran-<name>'.
| 
| Would the following addition be useful?
| 
|         If they are not you have to manually install them using
|         `install.packages()`.
| 
| Adding that to `README.Debian` would also be helpful in my opinion.
| 
| The main question then is though, what happens if that manually
| installed packages suddently is packaged for Debian?

That's an open issue which has been discussed many times on the r-sig-debian
list (== R Special Interest Group mailing list for 'R use on Debian / Ubuntu')
which is the best place for your question.  The list is hosted at ETH Zuerich
just like the other R lists; you need to subscribe to post (or use Gmane or
Nabble). 

Not really a bug, so closing this.  Adding / changing README.Debian is not a
bad idea but what you suggest is a little too basic.

Dirk  
(R maintainer on Debian and listowner for r-sig-debian)

 
 
| Thanks a million,
| 
| Paul
| 
| 
| [1] http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com/blog/
| 
| -- System Information:
| Debian Release: wheezy/sid
|   APT prefers unstable
|   APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
| Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
| 
| Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
| Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
| Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
| 
| Versions of packages r-base depends on:
| ii  r-base-core    2.14.0-1
| ii  r-recommended  2.14.0-1
| 
| Versions of packages r-base recommends:
| ii  r-base-html  2.14.0-1
| ii  r-doc-html   2.14.0-1
| 
| Versions of packages r-base suggests:
| pn  ess                     <none>
| pn  r-doc-info | r-doc-pdf  <none>
| 
| -- no debconf information
| xapplication/pgp-signature [Click mouse-2 to save to a file]

-- 
"Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it is too
dark to read." -- Groucho Marx


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to