Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2011 21:30:10 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#648713: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #648713,
regarding RM: libpodofo0.8.0 -- RoM; No longer needed.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
648713: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=648713
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libpodofo0.8.0
Version: 0.8.0+svn20100512-1.1
Severity: serious
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Dear libpodofo0.8.0 maintainers,
after having NMUed both libpodofo and libpodofo0.8.0 for the libjpeg
transition, I noticed that libpofodo0.8.0 was not getting built on some
architectures. After a short chat on #debian-buildd, it appeared that the
problem is that src:libpodofo0.8.0 builds libpodofo-dev, which is already
built by src:libpodofo.
Given that src:libpodofo0.8.0 has no reverse build-dependencies in both
testing and unstable and that all the packages now build against
src:libpodofo's -dev package, I think src:libpodofo0.8.0 should really get
removed from the archive.
Now, I propose to discuss this issue on that RC bugreport during _one_week_,
after which (depending on the held discussion) I will reassign this bug to
ftp.master.org as a removal.
Cheers,
OdyX
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'),
(500, 'stable'), (150, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_CH.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_CH.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages libpodofo0.8.0 depends on:
ii libc6 2.13-21
ii libfontconfig1 2.8.0-3
ii libfreetype6 2.4.7-2
ii libgcc1 1:4.6.2-4
ii libjpeg62 6b1-2
ii libstdc++6 4.6.2-4
ii libtiff4 3.9.5-2
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3
libpodofo0.8.0 recommends no packages.
libpodofo0.8.0 suggests no packages.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)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=9Gdl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
libpodofo0.8.0 | 0.8.0+svn20100512-1 | source
libpodofo0.8.0 | 0.8.0+svn20100512-1+b1 | armel, i386, mips
libpodofo0.8.0 | 0.8.0+svn20100512-1.1 | source, amd64, hurd-i386, ia64,
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
------------------- Reason -------------------
RoM; No longer needed.
----------------------------------------------
Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any
mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the
earliest.
Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.
We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they where closed
correctly or should have been re-assign to another package.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected].
The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/648713
This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[email protected].
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---
