Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2005 10:34:11 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#329658: tetex-extra depends on ptex-bin for installation
but not specified in package requirement
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 13:52:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 06:52:31 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 146.241.88.213.host.songnetworks.se (gw1.dican.com)
[213.88.241.146]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EIRV1-0000U3-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 06:52:31 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by gw1.dican.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B3A14F63B
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 15:51:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from gw1.dican.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (web [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
id 19538-03 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Thu, 22 Sep 2005 15:51:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from dican.dican.se (dican.dican.se [192.168.2.2])
by gw1.dican.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B774114F623
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 15:51:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.2.138] (mms_2k1.dican.se [192.168.2.138])
by dican.dican.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82762FD39
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 15:51:55 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 15:51:55 +0200
From: Magnus Sundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.2)
Gecko/20040803
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: tetex-extra depends on ptex-bin for installation but not specified
in package requirement
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at dican.se
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.2 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DEAR_SOMETHING,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: tetex-extra
Version: 2.0.2c-8
Dear sirs,
Thank you for maintaining Debian.
I have the following problem with tetex-extra:
Command "apt-get install tetex-extra" fails
Error something like "command ptex not found"
Workaround
apt-get install ptex-bin
(Gives error code depends on tetex-extra)
finally
apt-get install tetex-extra ptex-bin
gets tetex-extra installed
regards,
Magnus Sundberg
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 329658-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Sep 2005 08:34:48 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 27 01:34:48 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 146.241.88.213.host.songnetworks.se (gw1.dican.com)
[213.88.241.146]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EKAvI-0003qw-00; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 01:34:48 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by gw1.dican.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 324A914F633;
Tue, 27 Sep 2005 10:34:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from gw1.dican.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (web [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
id 28739-01; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 10:34:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from dican.dican.se (dican.dican.se [192.168.2.2])
by gw1.dican.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A62C14F625;
Tue, 27 Sep 2005 10:34:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.2.138] (mms_2k1.dican.se [192.168.2.138])
by dican.dican.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5486EFD39;
Tue, 27 Sep 2005 10:34:12 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 10:34:11 +0200
From: Magnus Sundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.2)
Gecko/20040803
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#329658: tetex-extra depends on ptex-bin for installation
but not specified in package requirement
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at dican.se
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Hi,
My system was upgraded from Woody. At that time I failed to get
the tetex-extra package installed, I do not know why. But I have
now verified that I now can install tetex-extra without having
ptex-bin installed. I do not know how this old bug propagated
through my system.
Please close the bug
Magnus
Hilmar Preusse wrote:
>
> No it does not. tetex-extra is usable without having ptex
innstalled.
> Please give us the output of "dpkg -l ptex*",
> "ls -l /tec/texmf/fmt.d/*" and
> "grep ptex /var/lib/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf" .
>
> Background: In the postin script of ptex-bin some old
ptex*.cnf are
> removed during purge but not renamed during remove. I'm afraid you
> have still sitting there some entries for ptex in your
fmtutil.cnf,
> which try to call ptex.
>
> Regards,
> Hilmar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
