Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 03:59:26 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libpam-modules: pam_mail reports "You have newmail"[sic] when 
using Maildir
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Nov 2001 10:27:41 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 15 04:27:41 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from homer.mathie.cx [62.189.57.194] (postfix)
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 164JkC-0007F7-00; Thu, 15 Nov 2001 04:27:40 -0600
Received: by homer.mathie.cx (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id B34D813FFC; Thu, 15 Nov 2001 10:25:00 +0000 (GMT)
From: Graeme Mathieson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Missing space in message from pam_mail
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.23
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.23
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 10:24:58 +0000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: libpam-modules
Version: 0.72-33
Severity: minor
Tags: patch

So utterly minor it's silly, but the 'standard' message which tells you
if you have new mail is missing a space...  Patch as follows:

--- pam_mail.c~ Mon Nov 22 02:15:45 1999
+++ pam_mail.c  Thu Nov 15 10:18:50 2001
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
 #define MAIL_ENV_NAME             "MAIL"
 #define MAIL_ENV_FORMAT           MAIL_ENV_NAME "=%s"
 #define YOUR_MAIL_VERBOSE_FORMAT  "You have %s mail in %s."
-#define YOUR_MAIL_STANDARD_FORMAT "You have %smail."
+#define YOUR_MAIL_STANDARD_FORMAT "You have %s mail."
 #define NO_MAIL_STANDARD_FORMAT   "No mail."

 #define _BSD_SOURCE

It's been bugging me. :)

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux fenrir 2.4.6 #6 SMP Fri Jul 20 12:14:26 BST 2001 i686 unknown
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB

Versions of packages libpam-modules depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.2.4-5    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libcap1                       1:1.10-10  support for getting/setting POSIX.
ii  libdb3                        3.2.9-11   Berkeley v3 Database Libraries [ru
ii  libpam0g                      0.72-33    Pluggable Authentication Modules l


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 184473-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2005 10:59:27 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 28 03:59:27 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (tennyson.dodds.net) 
[66.93.39.86] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EKZep-00045I-00; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 03:59:27 -0700
Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 94FAD7045; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 03:59:26 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 03:59:26 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: libpam-modules: pam_mail reports "You have newmail"[sic] when 
using Maildir
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Version: 0.79-1

Looking at the source, I believe this bug is fixed in libpam-modules 0.79-1.

Cheers,
--=20
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                   http://www.debian.org/

--fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDOneOKN6ufymYLloRAqFlAJoDDm29lVveT7TjcLFX1Ze1jLeRcQCbB/KO
2RZcYUSZ4iCfNfmZTAqtfyU=
=tHzY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to