Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 17:12:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Well, I'll keep maintaining fbgrab...
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jun 2005 15:20:03 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 03 08:20:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.210.211]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DeDxq-0003CX-00; Fri, 03 Jun 2005 08:20:03 -0700
Received: from ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (popix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de
[129.206.119.235])
by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
j53FMstL019333
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 17:22:54 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de
[129.206.100.140])
by ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA4808750
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 17:20:00 +0200
Received: from live (p54A71F12.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.167.31.18])
(authenticated bits=0)
by extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id
j53FK6bg019011
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 17:20:08 +0200
Received: from fernst by live with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DeDxm-0003Ux-FP
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 03 Jun 2005 17:19:58 +0200
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 17:19:58 +0200
From: Florian Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RFA: fbgrab -- Framebuffer grabber
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the fbgrab package, as I don't really use
framebuffer anymore. The package seems to be in good shape, there are
no bugs and it is up to date with upstream.
The package description is:
Grabs an image of a framebuffer device and store it as a png file.
.
Also has a timer-feature so you can do things before the image is
grabbed.
.
Homepage: http://hem.bredband.net/gmogmo/fbgrab/
--x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCoHUes3U+TVFLPnwRAtUqAJ4gSrGK76DmaOZ7K+eiijz6wuYCOACePMkq
Ub+vRzDgHOZCHkHsg9Wz0Qo=
=qa0V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 311829-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2005 15:12:27 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 28 08:12:27 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EKdbe-0004NY-00; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:12:27 -0700
Received: from ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (popix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de
[129.206.119.235])
by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j8SFCN1b011161
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 17:12:23 +0200
Received: from extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de
[129.206.100.140])
by ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA2695306
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 17:12:23 +0200
Received: from live (p54A70663.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.167.6.99])
(authenticated bits=0)
by extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id
j8SFCmcA004909
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 17:12:49 +0200
Received: from fernst by live with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1EKdbZ-0005aF-GS
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 17:12:21 +0200
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 17:12:21 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Well, I'll keep maintaining fbgrab...
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Z1Z8UV8BNhgCynIS"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: Florian Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--Z1Z8UV8BNhgCynIS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
As I started to use frambeuffer again I guess I can just continue
maintaining fbgrab...
Cheers,
Flo
--Z1Z8UV8BNhgCynIS
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDOrLVs3U+TVFLPnwRAv4MAJ96KzZ5xFpcoeirAfl8iNSevRPEEACcCdkU
38yNAy37LJm8nCUQrTb767A=
=UQVk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Z1Z8UV8BNhgCynIS--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
