Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2011 13:30:51 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#651657: fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #651657,
regarding override: libc6-i386:libs/optional, libc6-sparc64:libs/optional,
libc6-s390x:libs/optional, libc6-powerpc:libs/optional,
libc6-ppc64:libs/optional
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
651657: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651657
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ftp.debian.org
Hi,
Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
> override file for the following file(s):
>
> libc6-i386_2.13-22_amd64.deb: package says priority is optional, override
> says standard.
The declared priority of bi-arch libs was lowered to optional in r1768
(2006-08-22) in response to <http://bugs.debian.org/344253> but the
archive still seems to be using the old priorities.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
changes were made to the overrides...
Concerning package libc6-i386...
Operating on the unstable suite
Changed priority from standard to optional
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected].
This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[email protected].
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---
