Your message dated Sun, 18 Dec 2011 17:12:41 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#652489: NameError: global name 'ViewerFrameworkGUI' is 
not defined
has caused the Debian Bug report #652489,
regarding NameError: global name 'ViewerFrameworkGUI' is not defined
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
652489: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=652489
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: autodocktools
Version: 1.5.6~rc2+cvs.20110926-1
Severity: serious

Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
$ autodocktools 
Run ADT from  /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/AutoDockTools
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/AutoDockTools/__init__.py", line 433, 
in runADT
    title=title, withShell= not interactive, verbose=False, gui=gui)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Pmv/moleculeViewer.py", line 888, in 
__init__
    trapExceptions=trapExceptions)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ViewerFramework/VF.py", line 369, in 
__init__
    self.GUI = ViewerFrameworkGUI(self, title=title,
NameError: global name 'ViewerFrameworkGUI' is not defined
hit enter to continue

once press enter, the autodocktools interface just disappeared, I mean, 
terminated. 



Thanks with best regards,


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-rc63.2-mj-lina (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_SG.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_SG.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages autodocktools depends on:
ii  mgltools-molkit           1.5.6~rc2+cvs.20110926-1
ii  mgltools-pmv              1.5.6~rc2+cvs.20110926-1
ii  mgltools-support          1.5.6~rc2+cvs.20110926-1
ii  mgltools-viewerframework  1.5.6~rc2+cvs.20110926-1
ii  mgltools-volume           1.5.6~rc2+cvs.20110926-1
ii  python                    2.7.2-9
ii  python-imaging-tk         1.1.7-4
ii  python2.6                 2.6.7-4
ii  python2.7                 2.7.2-8

Versions of packages autodocktools recommends:
ii  mgltools-pyautodock   1.5.6~rc2+cvs.20110926-1
ii  mgltools-utpackages   1.5.6~rc2+cvs.20110926-1
ii  mgltools-webservices  1.5.6~rc2+cvs.20110926-1

Versions of packages autodocktools suggests:
pn  autodock       4.2.3-2
pn  autodock-vina  1.1.2-2
pn  ballview       <none>
pn  mgltools-cadd  <none>

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:02:00AM +0800, lina wrote:
> > $ apt-file search "/VF.py"
> > mgltools-viewerframework: 
> > /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/ViewerFramework/VF.py
> > mgltools-viewerframework: 
> > /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ViewerFramework/VF.py
> > mgltools-viewerframework: /usr/share/pyshared/ViewerFramework/VF.py
> 
> 
> seriously, why I use apt-file search "/VF.py", showed me nothing,
> 
> $ apt-file search "/VF.py"
> $ apt-file search "/VF.py"

Did you run "sudo apt-file update" ?
 
> $ ls -l /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/ViewerFramework/VF.py
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 48 Sep 27 17:47
> /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/ViewerFramework/VF.py ->
> ../../../../share/pyshared/ViewerFramework/VF.py
> 
> 
> $ ls -l /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ViewerFramework/VF.py
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 48 Sep 27 17:47
> /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ViewerFramework/VF.py ->
> ../../../../share/pyshared/ViewerFramework/VF.py
> 
> 
> all is symbolic link to one VF.py.

Yes, that's perfectly as I expected it to be and debhelpr organises
exactly this with all Python modules.
 
> Have you checked the VF.py in 2.6 and 2.7, just grep ViewerFrameworkGUI,
> 
> before removal of python2.6, there is none ViewerFrameworkGUI in my
> VF.py

That's *very* strange!!! You have proven yourself above that in both
cases the symlink is pointing to the very same file.

> even I had python 2.5, 3.2,2.7 on laptop, it's also removed the
> python-dev and else,
> $ cat dpkg.log | grep 2011-12-18 | grep -e python -e autodocktools |
> grep -v status | grep -v configure
> 2011-12-18 02:15:03 remove autodocktools 1.5.6~rc2+cvs.20110926-1 <none>
> 2011-12-18 02:15:08 purge autodocktools 1.5.6~rc2+cvs.20110926-1 <none>
> 2011-12-18 02:21:32 install autodocktools <none> 1.5.6~rc2+cvs.20110926-1
> 2011-12-18 13:14:55 remove autodocktools 1.5.6~rc2+cvs.20110926-1 <none>
> 2011-12-18 13:15:19 remove idle-python2.6 2.6.7-4 <none>
> 2011-12-18 13:15:30 purge idle-python2.6 2.6.7-4 <none>
> 2011-12-18 13:15:40 remove python-all-dev 2.7.2-9 <none>
> 2011-12-18 13:15:45 remove python2.6-dev 2.6.7-4 <none>
> 2011-12-18 13:15:48 remove libpython2.6 2.6.7-4 <none>
> 2011-12-18 13:15:49 purge libpython2.6 2.6.7-4 <none>
> 2011-12-18 13:15:55 remove python-all 2.7.2-9 <none>
> 2011-12-18 13:16:02 remove python2.6 2.6.7-4 <none>
> 2011-12-18 13:16:06 purge python2.6 2.6.7-4 <none>
> 2011-12-18 13:16:11 remove python2.6-minimal 2.6.7-4 <none>
> 2011-12-18 13:16:47 purge python2.6-minimal 2.6.7-4 <none>
> 2011-12-18 13:55:48 install idle-python2.7 <none> 2.7.2-8
> 2011-12-18 13:56:15 install autodocktools 1.5.6~rc2+cvs.20110926-1
> 1.5.6~rc2+cvs.20110926-1
> 2011-12-18 23:16:55 remove python2.5-dev 2.5.5-11 <none>
> 2011-12-18 23:17:00 remove python2.5 2.5.5-11 <none>
> 2011-12-18 23:17:06 purge python2.5 2.5.5-11 <none>

While I think cleaning up your system from unneeded outdated Python
versions I can not see anything enlightening in this log extract.
 
> > guarantees this for a lot of Python modules in Debian so we can assume
> > that this works reliable.
> >
> > I'd be tempted to close this bug because I can not reproduce it and it
> > should be solved on your machine as well.  Or will it come back once
> > you reinstall python2.6?
> 
> I reinstalled the python2.6 already, feel free to close this bug.

OK.  I'm doing it with this mail.

> (sorry I gotta a cold so stopped reproducing onc...)

Get well soon. :-)

> Thanks for your time,

Thanks for using Debian

      Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to