Your message dated Fri, 6 Jan 2012 00:50:32 +0400
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#654792: monit: why is the daemon binary moved?
has caused the Debian Bug report #654792,
regarding monit: why is the daemon binary moved?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
654792: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=654792
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: monit
Version: 1:5.3.2-1
Severity: normal

Hello,

I understand that the same binary can be used to connect to the daemon,
so it might be useful for some corner cases to have it in /usr/bin.
However, I'd think the vast majority of people using monit expect it to
be a system service with config in /etc and run as root, which means the
old location of /usr/sbin might be more appropriate.

I didn't see anything in README.Debian about this, by the way - I would
have thought a change that broke scripts would at least be mentioned.

Cheers,

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.3
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to en_US.utf8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

-- 
 -----------------------------------------------------------------
|   ,''`.                                            Stephen Gran |
|  : :' :                                        [email protected] |
|  `. `'                        Debian user, admin, and developer |
|    `-                                     http://www.debian.org |
 -----------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 06:28:02PM +0000, Stephen Gran wrote:
> I didn't see anything in README.Debian about this, by the way - I would
> have thought a change that broke scripts would at least be mentioned.

It was noted in NEWS, please read
/usr/share/doc/monit/NEWS.Debian.gz


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to