Your message dated Sat, 01 Oct 2005 13:54:54 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Was already fixed by upstream release 2.6.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2003 12:07:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 18 07:06:47 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.210.211]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19zxYa-00074S-00; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 07:06:44 -0500
Received: from mail.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de (mail.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de
[129.206.104.30])
by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id
h8IC6g4m002219;
Thu, 18 Sep 2003 14:06:43 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from hal.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [129.206.69.248])
by mail.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id
h8IC6gdK026442;
Thu, 18 Sep 2003 14:06:42 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from feuer.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.69.127])
by hal.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 19zxYX-00044L-00; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 14:06:41 +0200
Received: from thimo by feuer.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1
(Debian))
id 19zxYX-0002Oj-00; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 14:06:41 +0200
From: Thimo Neubauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libxalan2-java: using a EXSLT-function confuses parameters of named
templates
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 14:06:41 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Thimo Neubauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_16
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_16
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: libxalan2-java
Version: 2.5.0-1
Severity: normal
If I declare a EXSLT-function
<func:function name="my:title">
<xsl:param name="node" />
<func:result select="$node/title" />
</func:function>
only returning a title-node below, it's working ok. But if I use it as
a parameter of a named Template like this
<xsl:call-template name="subtemp">
<xsl:with-param name="first" select="'one'" />
<xsl:with-param name="second">
<xsl:value-of select="my:title(.)" />
</xsl:with-param>
</xsl:call-template>
the first parameter is overwritten by the text of the
title-node. Using the parameters in reverse order works as expected...
I've constructed a full testcase, I'll send the files as attachments
in a seperate mail (reportbug in woody doesn't support it)
Cheers
Thimo
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux feuer 2.4.21elemente #1 Fri Jun 27 15:41:23 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE
Versions of packages libxalan2-java depends on:
ii libbsf-java 1:2.3.0rc1-1 Bean Scripting Framework to suppor
ii libxerces2-java 2.4.0-1 Validating XML parser for Java
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 211531-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Oct 2005 11:53:17 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 01 04:53:16 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pop.gmx.de (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ELfvY-0004Nt-00; Sat, 01 Oct 2005 04:53:16 -0700
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 01 Oct 2005 11:52:45 -0000
Received: from p54818472.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.0.203])
[84.129.132.114]
by mail.gmx.net (mp028) with SMTP; 01 Oct 2005 13:52:45 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1941950
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 13:54:54 +0200
From: Wolfgang Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050929)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Was already fixed by upstream release 2.6.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: libxalan2-java
Version: 2.6.0-1
Hi,
I have tested the provided testcase against the current version in
debian and found that the bug has been fixed by upstream release
2.6.0 and above.
I therefore close this bug now for the revision 2.6.0-1 up.
Regards,
Wolfgang
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
