Your message dated Mon, 3 Oct 2005 10:48:51 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in upload of aide 0.10-10 to unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Mar 2005 15:03:17 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 06 07:03:17 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pizarro.unex.es [158.49.8.2] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D7xHp-0004mG-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 07:03:17 -0800
Received: from localhost (almendralejo.unex.es [158.49.8.199])
by pizarro.unex.es (Postfix/MJ-1.08) with ESMTP id 9307DA1CCE
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 6 Mar 2005 16:03:15 +0100 (CET)
Received: from pizarro.unex.es ([158.49.8.2])
by localhost (emilio [158.49.17.20]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 26683-03 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sun, 6 Mar 2005 16:03:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: from guadiana.unex.es (guadiana.unex.es [158.49.17.23])
by pizarro.unex.es (Postfix/MJ-1.08) with ESMTP id CC0A9A1CC8
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 6 Mar 2005 16:03:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: from cantor.unex.es ([158.49.18.105])
by guadiana.unex.es with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1D7xHm-0000rn-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 16:03:14 +0100
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 15:59:04 +0100 (CET)
From: Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: aide: statically linked but depends on libc (?)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at unex.es
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: aide
Version: 0.10-6.1
You may consider this as a reopening of Bug #87597.
While building this package for the hurd-i386 architecture, I noticed
that there is a hardcoded dependency on libc0.2, which does not exist.
Then I noticed about the debian/mkdep script, which seems like a hack.
It was my understanding that statically linked executables, by definition,
do not depend on libc at all, so the package dependency is artificial,
but if I'm missing anything and there is a real need to depend on the
libc of the day, then please do it in a portable way, which does not
need to be updated for every architecture. For example, you could
include a simple "hello world" program in the package source and just
compile and run dpkg-shlibdeps on it.
Thanks.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 298303-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Oct 2005 08:48:53 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 03 01:48:53 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 5301d.unt0.torres.l21.ma.zugschlus.de (torres.zugschlus.de)
[217.151.83.1] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EMM0C-0004L7-00; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 01:48:53 -0700
Received: from mh by torres.zugschlus.de with local (Exim 4.53)
id 1EMM0B-0000Ss-85; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 10:48:51 +0200
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 10:48:51 +0200
From: Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed in upload of aide 0.10-10 to unstable
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 9
Version: 0.10-10
And once more, I forgot to give the -v option to dpkg-buildpackage.
So, I have to tag the numerous bugs fixed by the upload of aide
0.10-10 to unstable manually as fixed. Stupid me.
Greetings
Marc
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834
Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 621 72739835
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
