Your message dated Mon, 3 Oct 2005 13:33:12 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#331070: libgtk+2.0-directfb0-udeb: has broken dependency
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Oct 2005 12:47:34 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 01 05:47:34 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp-out1.tiscali.nl [195.241.79.176]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ELgm6-00014p-00; Sat, 01 Oct 2005 05:47:34 -0700
Received: from [195.240.184.66] (helo=strider.fjphome.nl)
by smtp-out1.tiscali.nl with esmtp (Tiscali http://www.tiscali.nl)
id 1ELgm5-00079Y-Fb
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 01 Oct 2005 14:47:33 +0200
From: Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libgtk+2.0-directfb0-udeb: has broken dependency
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 14:47:29 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="nextPart13434631.DsdhPmQf9q";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--nextPart13434631.DsdhPmQf9q
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: libgtk+2.0-directfb0-udeb
Version: 2.0.9.2-1
The udeb depends on libdirectfb-udeb, but there's no such thing.
The proper dependency would be libdirectfb-0.9-22-udeb.
(Unless of course you feel that libdirectfb-0.9-22-udeb should provide=20
libdirectfb-udeb.)
Cheers,
=46JP
P.S. Would it be an idea to make [EMAIL PROTECTED] the maintainer of this=20
package with you as uploader?
--nextPart13434631.DsdhPmQf9q
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBDPoVpgm/Kwh6ICoQRAuBZAKCFkiCx/0sFGpBeBgVgiuRW3qTjpwCfcqwN
EjAXqQaWRRNRJ/9YUKu4hHQ=
=kQib
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart13434631.DsdhPmQf9q--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 331070-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Oct 2005 11:33:06 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 03 04:33:06 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp-out2.tiscali.nl [195.241.79.177]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EMOZ8-0005LS-00; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 04:33:06 -0700
Received: from [195.240.184.66] (helo=strider.fjphome.nl)
by smtp-out2.tiscali.nl with esmtp (Tiscali http://www.tiscali.nl)
id 1EMOZ7-0002ZS-8W
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 13:33:05 +0200
From: Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#331070: libgtk+2.0-directfb0-udeb: has broken dependency
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 13:33:12 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
This issue was solved in 2.0.9.2-3.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
