Your message dated Wed, 5 Oct 2005 00:36:58 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Pkg-doc-linux-devel] Bug#331711: doc-linux-text: NFS HOWTO is
missing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 21:04:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 04 14:04:59 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from e178083132.adsl.alicedsl.de (lazy.kicks-ass.org) [85.178.83.132]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EMty7-0006Wn-00; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 14:04:59 -0700
Received: by lazy.kicks-ass.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 5F80A1460B; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 23:04:17 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Henning Sprang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: doc-linux-text: NFS HOWTO is missing
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 23:04:17 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: doc-linux-text
Version: 2005.04-1
Severity: important
The NFS Howto is available since 2002 from TLDP. It very misleading that
it is not included in the Debian package. I consider this important, because it
render the doc-linux-text package providing unconsistent, old information
not synced correctly with TLDP.
It also means, as ther is nothing like an nfs-doc package, that there is not
very
much documentation about NFS at all in Debian.
BTW: the same goes for doc-linux-html, but I am not gonna write a copy of this
report for that package.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 331711-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 22:37:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 04 15:37:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from higgs.djpig.de [213.133.98.126]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EMvPC-0006p3-00; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 15:37:02 -0700
Received: from djpig by higgs.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EMvP8-0003Nx-OR
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 05 Oct 2005 00:36:58 +0200
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 00:36:58 +0200
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Pkg-doc-linux-devel] Bug#331711: doc-linux-text: NFS HOWTO is
missing
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
It's in doc-linux-{text,html}-nonfree since it is licensed under the
OPL 1.0 which is regarded as not DFSG-free...
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 11:04:17PM +0200, Henning Sprang wrote:
> The NFS Howto is available since 2002 from TLDP. It very misleading that
> it is not included in the Debian package. I consider this important, because
> it
> render the doc-linux-text package providing unconsistent, old information
> not synced correctly with TLDP.
>
> It also means, as ther is nothing like an nfs-doc package, that there is not
> very
> much documentation about NFS at all in Debian.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
