Your message dated Wed, 05 Oct 2005 11:28:48 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#332113: tetex-base depends on debconf without |
debconf-2.0 alternate; blocks cdebconf transition
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 23:46:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 04 16:46:55 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EMwUp-0005fa-00; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 16:46:55 -0700
Received: by kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 500)
id 9463E17F72; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 23:46:55 +0000 (GMT)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: tetex-base depends on debconf without | debconf-2.0 alternate; blocks
cdebconf transition
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 23:46:55 +0000 (GMT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joey Hess)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: tetex-base
This package depends/pre-depends on debconf without allowing the dependency
to be satisfied with an alternate of debconf-2.0. That is to say, its
dependency should read: debconf | debconf-2.0
Until this is fixed, it is impossible to use this package with cdebconf,
and very hard to impossible to install cdebconf at all.
debconf-2.0 was added to policy as a virtual package in 2002 and has been
provided by debconf since 2003. In early 2004, dh_installdebconf began
automatically adding it as an alternate to debconf in dependencies it
generates for packages using debhelper. So if you're using a current
version of debhelper you should only need to rebuild your package and
review it. If you are not using debhelper, make sure the dependency is
modified to allow debconf-2.0 to satisfy it.
This bug report was filed by semiautomated means after a trio of posts to
the debian-devel mailing list, and you have probably also received a bcced
mail about the issue before. If your package's dependencies are correct and
it really has some valid reason to depend on debconf alone, please reassign
this bug report to cdebconf with an explanation of what debconf feature
your package depends on, so it can be reimplemented in cdebconf.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 332113-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Oct 2005 09:28:57 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 05 02:28:57 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from idmailgate2.unizh.ch [130.60.127.101]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EN5a4-0004kW-00; Wed, 05 Oct 2005 02:28:56 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([130.60.169.224])
by idmailgate2.unizh.ch (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id
j959SnhK001499;
Wed, 5 Oct 2005 11:28:49 +0200
Received: from localhost
([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost.localdomain ident=frank)
by localhost.localdomain with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EN5Zx-0000aj-4D; Wed, 05 Oct 2005 11:28:49 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joey Hess)
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#332113: tetex-base depends on debconf without | debconf-2.0
alternate; blocks cdebconf transition
X-Attribution: fant
X-Ehrenamt: http://www.langau.de
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Joey Hess's message of
"Tue, 4 Oct 2005 23:46:55 +0000 (GMT)")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 11:28:48 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joey Hess) wrote:
> Package: tetex-base
>
> This package depends/pre-depends on debconf without allowing the dependen=
cy
> to be satisfied with an alternate of debconf-2.0. That is to say, its
> dependency should read: debconf | debconf-2.0
This has been fixed in our svn repository. Moreover, before I got the
bug number, I have uploaded yesterday a version based on 2.0.2 that also
fixes this bug.
Regards, Frank
--=20
Frank K=FCster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Z=FCrich
Debian Developer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
