Your message dated Fri, 16 Mar 2012 21:45:07 -0400
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: debian-faq is outdated in squeeze
has caused the Debian Bug report #662589,
regarding debian-faq is outdated in squeeze
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
662589: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662589
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: debian-faq
Version: 4.0.4+nmu1
Severity: normal
Debian-faq package is outdated in squeeze. It is
version 4.0.4+nmu1 and dated by 3 January 2010,
while on the debian.org website it is 5.0 and dated
27 August 2011.
Current faq describes Debian 'etch' as stable, which
is incorrect.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.4
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
debian-faq depends on no packages.
debian-faq recommends no packages.
Versions of packages debian-faq suggests:
ii ghostscript [postscript-vie 8.71~dfsg2-9 The GPL Ghostscript PostScript/PDF
ii w3m [www-browser] 0.5.2-9 WWW browsable pager with excellent
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Version: 5.0
Le -10/01/-28163 15:59, sindikat a écrit :
> Debian-faq package is outdated in squeeze. It is
> version 4.0.4+nmu1 and dated by 3 January 2010,
> while on the debian.org website it is 5.0 and dated
> 27 August 2011.
Using the BTS to ask an upload of a package ready in its VCS might be a
bit overkill.
Regards
David
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)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=j9eL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
