Your message dated Sun, 18 Mar 2012 16:53:53 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#240596: doc-rfc-std: The documents should use IETF
NNNN notation
has caused the Debian Bug report #240596,
regarding doc-rfc-std: The documents should use IETF NNNN notation
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
240596: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=240596
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: doc-rfc-std
Version: 20030621-1
Severity: wishlist
Socuments in the package use various numbering shemes
rfcNNN.txt*
rfcNNNN.txt*
It would be good idea to unify it to use same as
http://www.ietf.org/rfc uses, namely only
rfcNNNN.txt
Jari
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux cante 2.4.23 #1 SMP Wed Dec 24 03:49:19 EET 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.iso88591
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 04:40:25PM +0100, Iustin Pop wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 10:04:23AM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
> > Package: doc-rfc-std
> > Version: 20030621-1
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > Socuments in the package use various numbering shemes
> >
> > rfcNNN.txt*
> > rfcNNNN.txt*
> >
> > It would be good idea to unify it to use same as
> > http://www.ietf.org/rfc uses, namely only
> >
> > rfcNNNN.txt
>
> Hi,
>
> The RFC file names are as provided by IETF in the tarball of all RFCs
> (ftp.rfc-editor.org::rfc-ed-all/tar/RFC-all.tar.gz). So yes, that means
> they provide different names on the web as in the tarball.
>
> Unless they change the naming at the source, it doesn't make sense to do
> renaming ourselves just for packaging.
And as such, closing the bug; feel free to reopen if/when IETF changes
their numbering/distribution scheme.
iustin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
