Your message dated Wed, 05 Oct 2005 17:50:02 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327764: fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2005 14:52:49 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 11 07:52:49 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.lenk.info [217.160.183.176] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EETCL-0007OF-00; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 07:52:49 -0700
Received: from smtp.lenk.info ([82.165.24.235] ident=Debian-exim)
        by mail.lenk.info with esmtpsa 
        (Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50 1)
        id 1EETGd-0002cO-C6; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 16:57:15 +0200
Received: from vs5-deb.fnb.maschinenbau.tu-darmstadt.de ([130.83.174.41] 
helo=djpigpb.djpig.de)
        by smtp.lenk.info with esmtpsa 
        (Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50 1)
        id 1EETCJ-0007o5-Pe; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 16:52:47 +0200
Received: from djpig by djpigpb.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.52)
        id 1EET63-0003zO-So; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 16:46:19 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: very old package with RC bugs, should this be removed?
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 16:46:19 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: doc-debian-ko
Version: 2.1.2.1
Severity: serious

Hi.

During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
begun to go through the list of the oldest packages in Debian that are
not in testing (http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/oldest.html) to
search for packages that should be either orphaned or removed
completly from Debian (unstable and testing) since they have been
obviously neglected by their maintainer.

Your package did show up on this list and we propose to remove the package.

This usually means that your package matched some of the following criteria:

      [1] Your packages has not had an upload for more than two years

      [2] has one or more RC bugs with no answer from the maintainer (**)

      [3] the state of your packages in general seems to indicate that you 
might be MIA

      [4] (if we propose a removal) it shows in popcon as having less than 100 
users
          with the package installed.

      [5] the package was not released with sarge

and at least ([1] and ( [2] or [3] or [4] or [5] )) was true.

(**) The maintainer not answering to RC bugs refers to bugs filed more
than one month before the time the check was performed.

In your case the package older than 3 years, outdated and probably obsolete.

After 7 days without answer from you (the maintainer) we will reassign
this bug to either WNPP (in case we propose to orphan it) or
ftp.debian.org (in case we propose to remove it).

The package will need an upload or an explanation for this action not to 
proceed.

Please do *not* upload a package just to get off this list - it won't
help the package at all. Maintainers should be responsive and feel
responsible for their packages without needing other people to force
them to do work. Sometimes, finding a new maintainer or even removing
the package completly from the archive is better for Debian's users.

Thanks!
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 327764-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Oct 2005 00:53:20 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 05 17:53:20 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from jeroen by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1ENJxS-0005WA-00; Wed, 05 Oct 2005 17:50:02 -0700
From: Debian Archive Maintenance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: melanie $Revision: 1.43 $
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: Bug#327764: fixed
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 17:50:02 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

doc-debian-ko |    2.1.2.1 | source, all

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any
mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the
earliest.

Packages are never removed from testing by hand.  Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems.

Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System.  Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jeroen van Wolffelaar (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to