Your message dated Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:40:36 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#661889: reprepro: README files outdated
has caused the Debian Bug report #661889,
regarding reprepro: README files outdated
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
661889: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=661889
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reprepro
Version: 4.9.0-1
Severity: normal
README and README.Debian files are outdated. Examples:
* '...Due to threats that libdb3 will no release with etch...'
* '...while having only "main non-free and contrib" as components should...'
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
> README and README.Debian files are outdated. Examples:
>
> * '...Due to threats that libdb3 will no release with etch...'
Well, README.Debian is a format with announcements denoted by their
time. And it's not like their content no longer applies.
I've removed it anyway to avoid confusions. Thanks for the suggestion.
> * '...while having only "main non-free and contrib" as components should...'
Well, the example might be taken from a no longer common case, but I
found no more current example, so I think it is still better than not
having it.
Bernhard R. Link
--- End Message ---
