Your message dated Sun, 9 Oct 2005 19:59:53 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line never was a bug as you described it
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jul 2005 17:34:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 04 10:34:00 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zeus.eurotux.com (bragatel.pt) [194.38.142.74]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DpUp9-0005h9-00; Mon, 04 Jul 2005 10:33:41 -0700
Received: (qmail 22426 invoked by uid 1000); 4 Jul 2005 17:33:36 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Paulo Jorge Jesus Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: selinux-policy-default: missing file_contexts/program/dante.fc
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2005 18:33:36 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: selinux-policy-default
Version: 1:1.18-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When trying to install selinux-policy-default it fails:
blackTiger:~# LANG=C apt-get install selinux-doc selinux-policy-default
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
selinux-doc is already the newest version.
selinux-policy-default is already the newest version.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
1 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0B of archives.
After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used.
Setting up selinux-policy-default (1.18-1) ...
File "domains/program/cups.te" changed.
Copy/Ignore/Always ignore/view Diff [c/I/a/d]?
i
make: *** No rule to make target `file_contexts/program/dante.fc', needed
by `file_contexts/file_contexts'. Stop.
dpkg: error processing selinux-policy-default (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2
Errors were encountered while processing:
selinux-policy-default
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages selinux-policy-default depends on:
ii checkpolicy 1.24-1 SELinux policy compiler
ii libpam-modules 0.77-0.se5 Pluggable Authentication Modules f
ii libselinux1 1.24-1 SELinux shared libraries
ii m4 1.4.3-1 a macro processing language
ii make 3.80-9 The GNU version of the "make" util
ii policycoreutils 1.24-1 SELinux core policy utilities
ii python 2.3.5-3 An interactive high-level object-o
selinux-policy-default recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 316902-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Oct 2005 10:00:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 09 03:00:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp.sws.net.au [61.95.69.6]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EOXyL-0008Ac-00; Sun, 09 Oct 2005 03:00:02 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.sws.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84C3961B0C
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 20:00:00 +1000 (EST)
Received: from smtp.sws.net.au ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
id 06679-04 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sun, 9 Oct 2005 20:00:00 +1000 (EST)
Received: from aeon.coker.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.sws.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26FC561B00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 20:00:00 +1000 (EST)
Received: from aeon (aeon [127.0.0.1])
by aeon.coker.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B2CD37
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 19:59:59 +1000 (EST)
From: Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: never was a bug as you described it
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 19:59:53 +1000
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.91
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at sws.net.au
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On install selinux-policy-default asks many questions, this is a bug.
When answering those questions you made a mistake, you said yes to dante.te
but no to dante.fc.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
