Your message dated Mon, 10 Oct 2005 04:04:37 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326665: fixed in rpm 4.4.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 21:32:41 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 14:32:41 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EC26T-0005Ap-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 14:32:41 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (cpe-66-207-84-23.wb.hsw.ntelos.net
[66.207.84.23])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9514B18490
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 21:32:40 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 24C3EBEF1A; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 17:32:39 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 17:32:39 -0400
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: nmu diff
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: rpm
I've NMUed rpm to rebuild lsb-rpm with a new version of zlib to fix that
security issue, and it turns out to also FTBFS with current gcc, so I
had to fix that too. Here is the diff of my changes:
diff -ur old/rpm-4.0.4/debian/changelog rpm-4.0.4/debian/changelog
--- old/rpm-4.0.4/debian/changelog 2005-09-04 17:29:56.000000000 -0400
+++ rpm-4.0.4/debian/changelog 2005-09-04 17:07:01.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+rpm (4.0.4-31.1) unstable; urgency=3Dmedium
+
+ * OMU
+ * Rebuilt to replace static copy of zlib with one that is not vulnerable
+ to CAN-2005-2096. Closes: #318099
+ * python/rpmmodule.c: remove funky LHS casts to allow building with gcc
+ 4.0.2.
+
+ -- Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:38:14 -0400
+
diff -ur old/rpm-4.0.4/python/rpmmodule.c rpm-4.0.4/python/rpmmodule.c
--- old/rpm-4.0.4/python/rpmmodule.c 2002-02-03 18:59:57.000000000 -0500
+++ rpm-4.0.4/python/rpmmodule.c 2005-09-04 17:06:00.000000000 -0400
@@ -616,7 +616,7 @@
while (extensions->name) {
if (extensions->type =3D=3D HEADER_EXT_TAG
&& !xstrcasecmp(extensions->name + 7, str)) {
- (const struct headerSprintfExtension *) ext =3D extensions;
+ ext =3D extensions;
}
extensions++;
}
@@ -2546,7 +2546,7 @@
=20
while (extensions->name) {
if (extensions->type =3D=3D HEADER_EXT_TAG) {
- (const struct headerSprintfExtension *) ext =3D extensions;
+ ext =3D extensions;
PyDict_SetItemString(d, extensions->name, o=3DPyCObject_FromVo=
idPtr(ext, NULL));
Py_DECREF(o);
PyDict_SetItem(dict, tag, o=3DPyString_FromString(ext->name + =
7));
--=20
see shy jo
--cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDG2f3d8HHehbQuO8RAnoTAKDLuV2eJq8ru/Z1jhgZfhfg7eDvvwCgjKPB
X65SAUhlnYNxNiXdQycrt5M=
=ipgQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 326665-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Oct 2005 11:08:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 10 04:08:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EOvSP-0004rM-00; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 04:04:37 -0700
From: Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#326665: fixed in rpm 4.4.1-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 04:04:37 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 6
Source: rpm
Source-Version: 4.4.1-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rpm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
librpm-dev_4.4.1-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/r/rpm/librpm-dev_4.4.1-1_i386.deb
librpm4_4.4.1-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/r/rpm/librpm4_4.4.1-1_i386.deb
lsb-rpm_4.4.1-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/r/rpm/lsb-rpm_4.4.1-1_i386.deb
python2.3-rpm_4.4.1-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/r/rpm/python2.3-rpm_4.4.1-1_i386.deb
rpm_4.4.1-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/r/rpm/rpm_4.4.1-1.diff.gz
rpm_4.4.1-1.dsc
to pool/main/r/rpm/rpm_4.4.1-1.dsc
rpm_4.4.1-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/r/rpm/rpm_4.4.1-1_i386.deb
rpm_4.4.1.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/r/rpm/rpm_4.4.1.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated rpm package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 09:56:32 +1000
Source: rpm
Binary: python2.3-rpm rpm librpm-dev lsb-rpm librpm4
Architecture: source i386
Version: 4.4.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
librpm-dev - RPM shared library, development kit
librpm4 - RPM shared library
lsb-rpm - Red Hat package manager for LSB package building
python2.3-rpm - Python bindings for RPM
rpm - Red Hat package manager
Closes: 193930 214406 218348 313916 318626 326142 326665
Changes:
rpm (4.4.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream releases (Closes: #214406, #193930)
* Add myself to uploaders
* Create python bindings (Closes: #218348, #326142)
* Correct the German translation (Closes: #313916)
* Acknowledge OMU (Closes: #326665)
* Make _sysconfdir point to /etc (Closes: #318626)
* Standards-Version: 3.6.2.1
* Other random funkiness
Files:
7bc9dc6e57b7830b9b2b91b0af7c65ae 997 admin optional rpm_4.4.1-1.dsc
90ded9047b1b69d918c6c7c7b56fd7a9 11497447 admin optional rpm_4.4.1.orig.tar.gz
28a69b743d76a3b470d861492181a521 515950 admin optional rpm_4.4.1-1.diff.gz
5af9b02f9c892bfc7dd58a313ff402be 835978 admin optional rpm_4.4.1-1_i386.deb
a2d1a8dfabbb747bfe43b33d22732189 2131620 devel optional
lsb-rpm_4.4.1-1_i386.deb
d9a0dbb8a56ccf18fc2ecff4d272d1d7 940508 libs optional librpm4_4.4.1-1_i386.deb
9c7698cc79af7d4ed20861b2ef755131 1261906 libdevel extra
librpm-dev_4.4.1-1_i386.deb
166e1717a781728fbe1456dec734cb1d 477222 python extra
python2.3-rpm_4.4.1-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iQCVAwUBQ0inFWRmcAD8BdppAQLHmAQA077ZpakJfovbMZHxzpNDxhezQPc5bwuT
bZASDDz3ua0IO1uqi8QzDJyC3uy9aAa3wVMyWAoRxfvaq4u2hJohynBF4vhThYSM
3hi6KHgd/TE3Yvky2agNS7NR7+SFnh+H7UQGGLs6eedG9hutbtxlZkqO3UQYewDE
xmiCFH4PAhs=
=IsPh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
