Your message dated Fri, 8 Jun 2012 12:15:47 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#676541: closed by Ron <[email protected]> (roaraudio
dependency removed from ices2)
has caused the Debian Bug report #676541,
regarding ices2: Please re-enable RoarAudio support (im_roar)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
676541: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676541
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ices2
Version: 2.0.1-12
Severity: wishlist
flum,
The ices2 package used to ship RoarAudio support.
This was removed in 2.0.1-12.
ChangeLog tells us:
* Stop build-depending on libroar-dev or suggesting roaraudio-server.
Requested by Ron Lee.
It seems there was no public discusion on this nor does the ChangeLog tell
why this was done.
I request re-enabling RoarAudio support. As far as I know there was no
problem with it.
This ticket should be closed before the freeze (independed on result)
to ensure smallest possible effect to users.
Thank you for your help and work.
--
Philipp.
(Rah of PH2)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 12-06-08 at 02:43am, Philipp Schafft wrote:
> # reopening as not solved in any way
I agree with Ron. This bug is now closed: It was a kind request to
reenable Roar support, and the request is hereby kindly turned down.
Please note that as package maintainer I have the final say in this: Do
*not* reopen this bugreport again. You are however welcome to continue
the discussion here (closed != closed for discussion).
> On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 23:09 +0000, [Ron] wrote:
> > > I'm a little surprised that you claim there was no prior
> > > discussion or that you don't know why this was done, since the
> > > need for this was discussed with you in person,
>
> Oh, I was asked by the maintainer (Jonas Smedegaard who did *all*
> uploads) to open this ticket exactly because it was not discussed
> publicly and not with me or anyone else.
No, you were asked to open this bugreport for _this_ discussion to be
public (independent of prior discussions).
> > > as the only logical conclusion to you digging your heels in and
> > > insisting that obsolete things were Absolutely Essential to the
> > > functionality of roar, and that you and the-me would rather see
> > > roar removed before dropping things like the abandoned celt codec,
> > > or DECnet ...
>
> This seems to be your personal vendetta against me and other persons.
Then ignore such remarks: Focus on the technical points. :-)
Yes, there _was_ technical points in that mail from Ron!
> Please also stop closing random bugs because you don't like them.
> Thanks.
Not random: Ron commented because I asked him to do so, and closed after
asking me first.
> PS: Your MUA only sets 'Ron' as real name, this makes it harder for
> people to use the search in their MUA. Please consider changing this.
Names are pretty irrelevant for focusing on the technical points.
Kind regards,
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
