Your message dated Tue, 12 Jun 2012 21:06:09 +0300
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: [pkg-dhcp-devel] Bug#675045: isc-dhcp-server-ldap patch
has caused the Debian Bug report #675045,
regarding isc-dhcp-server-ldap patch
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
675045: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675045
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: isc-dhcp-server;
Hi..
I am installing dhcp with ldap and I am with some problems!!!
Using the debian patch it didn't work... in logs reports
!(|(|(objectClass=dhcpTSigKey)(objectClass=dhcpClass))
(objectClass=dhcpFailOverPeer) value does not conform to assertion syntax..
But i dont have any dhcpTSigKey, dhcpClass or dhcpFailOverPeer in my
tree in ldap.
What is necessary to add for this to work?
--
Regards:
Fátima Leal
--
Cps:
Fátima Leal
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mi, 30 mai 12, 11:00:49, José Luis Redrejo Rodríguez wrote:
> You can find use information of a current setup at
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianEdu/LdapifyServices
>
> Also, if you take a look at debian-edu-config package you'll find even
> a full ldap setup.
>
> Regards.
>
> 2012/5/29 Fátima Leal <[email protected]>:
> > Package: isc-dhcp-server;
> >
> > Hi..
> >
> > I am installing dhcp with ldap and I am with some problems!!!
> >
> > Using the debian patch it didn't work... in logs reports
> > !(|(|(objectClass=dhcpTSigKey)(objectClass=dhcpClass))
> > (objectClass=dhcpFailOverPeer) value does not conform to assertion syntax..
> > But i dont have any dhcpTSigKey, dhcpClass or dhcpFailOverPeer in my
> > tree in ldap.
> > What is necessary to add for this to work?
Hello,
This report seems to be due to a configuration issue and was filed
against an inexistent package (notice the ';' in the Package: field),
which is why I'm closing it.
Feel free to open a new report with more informations regarding the
problem encountered.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
