Your message dated Tue, 12 Jun 2012 23:35:03 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Old bugs filed against links-ssl
has caused the Debian Bug report #120539,
regarding links-ssl: Doesn't allow customization of colors
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
120539: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=120539
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: links-ssl
Version: 0.96-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
as far as I can see, there's no option available to customize the color
scheme that links is using, when you active the option 'color' in the
'terminal settings'. Please offer support to customize the colors in
future versions. Thanks.
Christian
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux salem.getuid.de 2.4.15-pre4 #1 Thu Nov 15 14:23:14 CET 2001 i586
Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro
Versions of packages links-ssl depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.4-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgpmg1 1.19.3-6 General Purpose Mouse Library [lib
ii libssl0.9.6 0.9.6b-2 SSL shared libraries
--
If a man loses his reverence for any part of life, he will lose his
reverence for all of life.
-- Albert Schweitzer
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.6-2
Hi Andrei!
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> According to the changelog that package is not being built since
> 2.1pre33-1, which is why I'm contacting you about these bugs. I'm
> guessing they should be reassigned to the links package, but it's
> quite a few of them and I didn't want to take any action before
> asking :)
Thanks a lot for reminding me of these. Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
approached me a few weeks because of these, too, but back then I just
found time to work through a few of them.
I've now checked all the remaining ones. At least some of them are
duplicates of bugs against links or links2, others are fixed in
links/links2 in the meanwhile (those should be closed with this mail),
but many seem still present.
> Since most of these are quite old I could also try contacting the
> submitters to see if they still apply to recent versions of links.
Here's my summary (Cc'ed to all mentioned bugs, some of them closed
via -done) of these bugs and what I did so far:
> #142934 links-ssl: links does not check /etc/hosts when resolving a domain
> name
No more present. Closing.
> #165714 links-ssl: links doesn't take into account http_proxy environment
> variable
Duplicate of #55425. Forcemerged.
> #109735 links-ssl 0.92 is sometimes so better than 0.96...
Maybe a duplicate of #509469. Contacting the reporter or the
commenters would likely be the sanes option. Haven't touched it yet.
> #163416 links-ssl: Internal error forces core dump
No more happens in Debian Squeeze. Closing.
> #139637 links-ssl: Erratic control behavior in xterm
Is tagged as unreproducible -> Asking the reporter (which is MIA) or
directly closing. Haven't touched it yet.
> #90849 Improper handling of relative URL
Still present. Reassigned.
> #145121 links-ssl: (e)Links keeps control of GPM when it isn't displaying.
No more present in Debian Unstable _and_ a duplicate of #108431 which
I can no more reproduce anymore in Unstable. Yay! Reassigned. Closing.
> #150960 links-ssl: No manpage for links.cfg
Still present in Unstable. Reassigned.
> #160336 links-ssl: menu and doc problems
Of 4 things mentioned in there, 1 is fixed (|), 1 is no more
applicable (h/y), 1 is still there (*) and with the fourth thing, I'm
not sure what he means. The "z" keybinding for "Go back in URL
history" is indeed still present in unstable. Reassigned and
retitled.
> #158967 links-ssl: codepages and language choices are a mystery to the user
Of 3 things mentioned in here, 2 are fixed (languages and codepages
are now a menu), and the third (blank on startup without parameter) is
still present, but likely a wontfix + upstream or such. Reassigned,
tagged and retitled.
> #203876 links-ssl: doesn't handle files with @ in name
Still present. The easiest workaround (and likely that upstream did
that on purpose), is to prepend "./". Reassigned and tagged as wontfix
as this looks like on purpose.
> #141383 links-ssl: Ability to spawn $EDITOR
Still present. Reassigned and tagged upstream.
> #144542 links-ssl: Link Numbering not consistent
Can't reproduce it anymore and according to the last mail a fix has
been committed upstream:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=144542#11
Closing.
> #148010 links doesn't do authorized redirection
Gah. That sounds like an ugly feature. Not sure what to do. That needs
a non-trivial setup to test. Reassigned. Will maybe test it somewhen
after the freeze.
> #148930 links-ssl: forms interface inconsistent with menu interface
Still present. Reassigned.
> #120539 links-ssl: Doesn't allow customization of colors
No more present. I just switched to yellow links in the terminal. ;-)
Closing.
> #90590 key to go to url based upon selected link would be handy
Still present. Reassigned.
> #140126 links-ssl: links can't use a proxy that needs authentification
Still present. Reassigned.
> #130582 Provide filename suffixes for viewers.
Clearly fixed. Closing.
> #138240 links can not hide hidden <link href="..."> tags
Still present. Example: /usr/share/doc/developers-reference/index.html
Reassigned.
(I hope none of the bug reporters minds this mass-bug-closing and
-replying. :-)
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <[email protected]>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
`- | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
--- End Message ---
