Your message dated Wed, 13 Jun 2012 08:36:59 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Re: Bug#363791: [AUTO] mozilla-thunderbird: When selecting 
attachment, follows symlinks to use real file name
has caused the Debian Bug report #363791,
regarding mozilla-thunderbird: When selecting attachment, follows symlinks to 
use real file name
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
363791: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=363791
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: mozilla-thunderbird
Version: 0.8-3
Severity: minor

Hi Alex,

I just noticed that when selecting email attachments, if you select a
symlink, Thunderbird will follow the symlink and call the attachment by the
name of the real file (not the name of the symlink).

To reproduce:

Open the Compose window, select "Attach", select (for instance)
viewglob_1.0.1.orig.tar.gz, which happens to be a symlink to
viewglob-1.0.1.tar.gz, and click Open.  The name of the attached file is
listed in the upper right of the Compose window as "viewglob-1.0.1.tar.gz".
The expected behavior would be for it to be named
"viewglob_1.0.1.orig.tar.gz".

This may be related to a similar symlink bug in Mozilla Firefox, reported at
http://bugs.debian.org/221870 .

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-powerpc
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages mozilla-thunderbird depends on:
ii  libatk1.0-0               1.6.1-5        The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libc6                     2.3.2.ds1-18   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libfontconfig1            2.2.3-2        generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6              2.1.7-2.2      FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgcc1                   1:3.4.2-3      GCC support library
ii  libglib2.0-0              2.4.7-1        The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2.0-0               2.4.13-1       The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libpango1.0-0             1.4.1-4        Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libstdc++5                1:3.3.5-2      The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libx11-6                  4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6                  4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxft2                   2.1.2-6        FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxp6                    4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System printing extension
ii  libxrender1               0.8.3-7        X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  libxt6                    4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii  xlibs                     4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System client libraries m
ii  zlib1g                    1:1.2.2-1      compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information

regards,

-- 
Kevin B. McCarty <[email protected]>   Physics Department
WWW: http://www.princeton.edu/~kmccarty/    Princeton University
GPG public key ID: 4F83C751                 Princeton, NJ 08544


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello Kevin,

Am -10.01.-28163 20:59, schrieb Kevin B. McCarty:
> On 11/12/2004 11:48 AM, Alexander Sack wrote:
> 
>> In addition to testing the upgrade path I ask you for help to verify 
>> if your bug is still present. So please take a minute or two and 
>> install the preview package to look if everything is fine and if your
>> bug is still present.
> 
> It looks like the attachment symlink problem is still present in
> moz-thunderbird 0.9-3.  (Note that I'm on powerpc so I built it myself
> from the 0.9-3 source and diff.gz you provided, but I can't see that
> making a difference.)
> 
> regards,
> 

I know there is a lot of time passed by and your bugreport is long ago.
But the bug ist still open.
Do you still have this behavior in the actual versions (that I can't
really belive)? Hopefully not. Infact of the age I close the bug.

Please open a new bugreport if you have problems with the new versions.

Regards
Carsten


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to