Your message dated Thu, 13 Oct 2005 05:02:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#329928: fixed in openipmi 2.0.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Sep 2005 14:18:39 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 24 07:18:39 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from thumper.technologeek.org [62.4.21.145] (postfix)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EJArP-0000bn-00; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 07:18:39 -0700
Received: by thumper.technologeek.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 3E18D116228D; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 16:18:37 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libopenipmi-dev: wrong description, talks about libxosd
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 16:18:37 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: libopenipmi-dev
Severity: minor

The long description for libopenipmi-dev talks about libxosd...

Description: Intelligent Platform Management Interface - development
 IPMI allows remote monitoring and remote management of devices.
 .
 This package contains the development headers needed for compiling
 programs against libxosd.


s/libxosd/libopenipmi/ :)

JB.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 329928-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Oct 2005 12:08:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 13 05:08:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EQ1mn-0008Qj-00; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 05:02:13 -0700
From: =?utf-8?b?Tm/DqGwgS8O2dGhl?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#329928: fixed in openipmi 2.0.2-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 05:02:13 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: openipmi
Source-Version: 2.0.2-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
openipmi, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libopenipmi-dev_2.0.2-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openipmi/libopenipmi-dev_2.0.2-1_i386.deb
libopenipmi0_2.0.2-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openipmi/libopenipmi0_2.0.2-1_i386.deb
openipmi_2.0.2-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/o/openipmi/openipmi_2.0.2-1.diff.gz
openipmi_2.0.2-1.dsc
  to pool/main/o/openipmi/openipmi_2.0.2-1.dsc
openipmi_2.0.2-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openipmi/openipmi_2.0.2-1_i386.deb
openipmi_2.0.2.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/o/openipmi/openipmi_2.0.2.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Noèl Köthe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated openipmi package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 18:35:21 +0200
Source: openipmi
Binary: openipmi libopenipmi-dev libopenipmi0
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Noèl Köthe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Noèl Köthe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 libopenipmi-dev - Intelligent Platform Management Interface - development
 libopenipmi0 - Intelligent Platform Management Interface - runtime
 openipmi   - Intelligent Platform Management Interface (for servers)
Closes: 329928
Changes: 
 openipmi (2.0.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * new upstream release from 2005-07-14
   * changed build-dep to libsnmp9-dev
   * corrected stuppid typo
     (closes: Bug#329928)
Files: 
 4bab44a7d145fad33de00545bf7404ef 642 admin optional openipmi_2.0.2-1.dsc
 8ac7849e72fe849c5ce95e6dd8719ca3 2091730 admin optional 
openipmi_2.0.2.orig.tar.gz
 ba934218254e5feb1ac9a5b5469d764d 15102 admin optional openipmi_2.0.2-1.diff.gz
 72c7498b5fd096cd6709ca3fa41f303c 106440 admin optional 
openipmi_2.0.2-1_i386.deb
 255792e33d4e4c5535f5e3763b787018 448102 devel optional 
libopenipmi0_2.0.2-1_i386.deb
 ae76f44f134b5ba6145d749c2147dbb0 593640 libdevel optional 
libopenipmi-dev_2.0.2-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDS6c39/DnDzB9Vu0RAu0UAJ416om7JCRs42Lu4Yo/czqNrN1eQACeIweT
p2FO+uv8Y2gHZgwxcuAXA9Y=
=3ZKO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to