Your message dated Thu, 13 Oct 2005 21:09:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in upload of tetex-base 3.0-8 to experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Aug 2005 09:08:37 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 24 02:08:37 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from idmailgate1.unizh.ch [130.60.127.100]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E7rFN-0003yE-00; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 02:08:37 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([130.60.169.214])
by idmailgate1.unizh.ch (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id
j7O98Ywk031973
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 11:08:35 +0200
Received: from localhost
([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost.localdomain ident=frank)
by localhost.localdomain with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1E7rFK-0002Fq-Ik
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 11:08:34 +0200
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: tetex-base: check whether pdftex.cfg was locally changed before
acting on it
X-Debbugs-CC: Frank =?iso-8859-1?q?K=FCster?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Attribution: fant
X-Ehrenamt: http://www.langau.de
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 11:08:34 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: tetex-base
Version: 3.0-7
Severity: minor
The transition code from pdftex.cfg to pdftexconfig.tex is executed
unconditionally, even if pdftex.cfg is unchanged from the old shipped
version, and a *.postinst-bak file is created. We should instead check
the md5sum and just remove the file if it is unchanged.
Regards, Frank
--=20
Frank K=FCster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Z=FCrich
Debian Developer
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 324826-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Oct 2005 19:09:40 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 13 12:09:40 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp05.web.de [217.72.192.209]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EQ8SS-0007HT-00; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 12:09:40 -0700
Received: from [212.14.71.206] (helo=preusse.amasol.de)
by smtp05.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.105 #317)
id 1EQ8Rv-0001av-00; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 21:09:07 +0200
Received: by preusse.amasol.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 13 Oct 2005
21:09:05 +0200
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 21:09:04 +0200
From: Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Fixed in upload of tetex-base 3.0-8 to experimental
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Operating-System: CYGWIN_NT-5.0 1.5.18(0.132/4/2) i686
X-Face: .n=jHnz:2pu0c0)ef]4O#1FE{Vak?h89!g7_#2+PzSRoIU[pJFNnz>gLhn}UMwv}4/j{X..
2E+>U>P!`PYk
X-Confirmation-Request: yes
X-Confirm-Reading-To: "Hilmar Preusse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On 13.10.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> tag 324826 + fixed-in-experimental
>
Should have tag experimental -> Closing.
> tag 325891 + fixed-in-experimental
>
Should have tag experimental -> Closing.
H.
--
sigmentation fault
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
