Your message dated Wed, 27 Jun 2012 14:59:18 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#678732: fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #678732,
regarding override: hpijs:oldlibs/extra, hplip-cups:oldlibs/extra
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
678732: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678732
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ftp.debian.org
---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Subject: hplip override disparity
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012, 14:32:37
From: Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]>
To: Mark Purcell <[email protected]>, Debian HPIJS and HPLIP maintainers <pkg-
[email protected]>
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
hpijs_3.12.6-2_all.deb: package says section is oldlibs, override says text.
hpijs_3.12.6-2_all.deb: package says priority is extra, override says
optional.
hplip-cups_3.12.6-2_all.deb: package says section is oldlibs, override says
text.
hplip-cups_3.12.6-2_all.deb: package says priority is extra, override says
optional.
Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database, debug, fonts, gnu-r, gnustep, haskell,
httpd, java, kernel, lisp, localization, ocaml, php, ruby, vcs, video,
xfce, zope. At this time a script was used to reclassify packages into
these sections. If this is the case, please only reply to this email if
the new section is inappropriate, otherwise please update your package
at the next upload.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package
so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the
override is incorrect then please file a bug against ftp.debian.org and
explain why. Please INCLUDE the list of packages as seen above, or we
won't be able to deal with your request due to missing information.
Please make sure that the subject of the bug you file follows the
following format:
Subject: override: BINARY1:section/priority, [...], BINARYX:section/priority
Include the justification for the change in the body of the mail please.
[NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you already filed a bug
and have not received a response yet, please ignore this mail. Your bug
needs to be processed by a human and will be in due course, but until
then the installer will send these automated mails; sorry.]
--
Debian distribution maintenance software
(This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there
is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by
mailing [email protected])
-----------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
changes were made to the overrides...
Concerning package hpijs...
Operating on the unstable suite
Changed priority from optional to extra
Changed section from text to oldlibs
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected].
This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[email protected].
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---
