Your message dated Wed, 4 Jul 2012 15:25:20 +0100
with message-id 
<CAPQ4b8=5kyosWKZ52Y=gMR=gz13ty3z3bl0vknzrisgxbkb...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Closing orphan/obsolete bugs (emacs21 with tag unreproducible)
has caused the Debian Bug report #151679,
regarding emacs21 segfautls on pasting X selection with unreasonable coding 
system
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
151679: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=151679
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: emacs21
Version: 21.1-7
Severity: normal

While fighting with the symptoms of Bug 144806 I discovered that I can
reliably crash emecs21 by setting the coding system for the X selection
to emacs-mule and then paste an รค (a umlaut) from a xterm into emacs.

The last thing emacs does is displaying "mark set".
The stack trace looks funny:

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x08080245 in XMapRaised ()
(gdb) bt
#0  0x08080245 in XMapRaised ()
#1  0x00000126 in ?? ()
#2  0x08087da5 in XMapRaised ()
#3  0x080c9595 in XMapRaised ()
#4  0x080c9458 in XMapRaised ()
#5  0x080c8d8b in XMapRaised ()
#6  0x080c9eb3 in XMapRaised ()
#7  0x0812354d in error ()
#8  0x0814992c in error ()
#9  0x08123af7 in error ()
#10 0x08123661 in error ()
#11 0x0814992c in error ()
#12 0x08122b74 in error ()
#13 0x081219c1 in re_compile_pattern ()
#14 0x08149dda in error ()
#15 0x08123af7 in error ()
#16 0x08123661 in error ()
#17 0x0814992c in error ()
#18 0x08123af7 in error ()
#19 0x08123661 in error ()
#20 0x0814992c in error ()
#21 0x08123af7 in error ()
#22 0x08123661 in error ()
#23 0x0814992c in error ()
#24 0x08123af7 in error ()
#25 0x08123661 in error ()
#26 0x08120209 in re_compile_pattern ()
#27 0x080da005 in abort ()
#28 0x080d11a0 in abort ()
#29 0x08121aa9 in re_compile_pattern ()
#30 0x080d0538 in abort ()
#31 0x0812163d in re_compile_pattern ()
#32 0x080d04e7 in abort ()
#33 0x080d0061 in abort ()
#34 0x080d0190 in abort ()
#35 0x080cf0ff in abort ()
#36 0x402d914f in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux prony 2.4.18-pre9-ext3debug #2 Mit Mai 8 10:44:23 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=de_DE@euro, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro

Versions of packages emacs21 depends on:
ii  dpkg                     1.9.20          Package maintenance system for Deb
ii  emacsen-common           1.4.15          Common facilities for all emacsen.
ii  libc6                    2.2.5-6         GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libjpeg62                6b-5            The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  liblockfile1             1.03            NFS-safe locking library, includes
ii  libncurses5              5.2.20020112a-7 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libpng2                  1.0.12-3        PNG library - runtime
ii  libtiff3g                3.5.5-6         Tag Image File Format library
ii  xaw3dg                   1.5-9           Xaw3d widget set
ii  xlibs                    4.1.0-9         X Window System client libraries
ii  zlib1g                   1:1.1.4-1       compression library - runtime



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,

Thanks for your interest in improving Debian, and sorry that the bugs
were not fully resolved in due time.

emacs21 packages have been removed from testing in 2009 [1], not
present even in the current stable.  Consequently, these bugs are now
orphan (without maintainer assigned) so they probably will not be
attended/noticed further.

[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/e/emacs21.html

The bugs deemed valid are going to be verified and reassigned, but the
current bugs that I'm closing now are very ancient (more than 10 years
sometimes) and marked as unreproducible years ago.  Please comment if
you want think that some of the raised questions are still pending and
need to be addressed differently (e.g., reassigned to other packages,
etc.).

Cheers.


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to