Your message dated Wed, 4 Jul 2012 15:40:05 +0100
with message-id
<CAPQ4b8keBuSM7-ysaqxXdQuAmvDAU=apndyotwpkh2ucv15...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Closing orphan/obsolete bugs (emacs21-el with tag
unreproducible or fixed-upstream)
has caused the Debian Bug report #303750,
regarding emacs21-el: allout.el: outline-regexp fails with some header-prefix
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
303750: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=303750
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: emacs21-el
Version: 21.4a-1
Severity: normal
allout.el does not work with some types of outline-header-prefix.
If I set outline-header-prefix, e.g., to "CCC_", outline-open-topic
does not make right topic, shows strange behavior.
I found this error comes from set-outline-regexp.
There is a block as follows in definition of set-outline-regexp:
;; Produce the new outline-regexp:
(setq outline-regexp (concat "\\(\\"
outline-header-prefix
"[ \t]*["
outline-bullets-string
"]\\)\\|\\"
outline-primary-bullet
"+\\|\^l"))
This definition should be replaced with as follows:
;; Produce the new outline-regexp:
(setq outline-regexp (concat "\\("
(regexp-quote outline-header-prefix)
"[ \t]*["
outline-bullets-string
"]\\)\\|"
(regexp-quote outline-primary-bullet)
"+\\|\^l"))
I realized that this error also occurs if explicitly set "***_" to
outline-header-prefix. This time outline-regexp's value is:
"\\(\\***_[
]*[\\.:,;\\*\\+--=>(\\[{}&!\\?#%\"X@\\$~_\\\\\\*]\\)\\|\\*+\\|\f".
The asterisk triplet is not expressed in the regular expression.
In this case asterisk need not to be triplet; "*_", or "*******_"
work as well. I do not think we expect these behavior.
SAITO Fuyuki, [email protected]
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
Locale: LANG=ja_JP.eucJP, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.eucJP (charmap=EUC-JP)
Versions of packages emacs21-el depends on:
ii emacs21-common 21.4a-1 The GNU Emacs editor's shared, arc
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,
Thanks for your interest in improving Debian, and sorry that the bugs
were not fully resolved in due time.
emacs21 packages have been removed from testing in 2009 [1], not
present even in the current stable. Consequently, these bugs are now
orphan (without maintainer assigned) so they probably will not be
attended/noticed further.
[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/e/emacs21.html
The bugs deemed valid are going to be verified and reassigned, but the
current bugs that I'm closing now are very ancient (more than 10 years
sometimes) and marked as unreproducible or fixed upstream years ago.
Please comment if you want think that some of the raised questions are
still pending and need to be addressed differently (e.g., reassigned
to other packages, etc.).
Cheers.
--- End Message ---
