Your message dated Sat, 28 Jul 2012 16:48:10 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#680378: [buildd.debian.org] ia32-libs-* entries in
Packages-arch-specific still wrong
has caused the Debian Bug report #680378,
regarding [ia32-libs-i386] ia32-libs uninstallable: ia32-libs-i386 missing and
buildd not building
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
680378: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680378
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ia32-libs-i386
Version: 20120701
Severity: normal
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
ia32-libs is 20120701, but ia32-libs-i386 is still 20120616, and as such
ia32-libs is uninstallable
(unupgradable) now.
Looking at the buildd it looks like it doesn't want to build it (could be
wrong, not very familiary with how the buildd works):
https://buildd.debian.org/status/architecture.php?a=i386&suite=sid
Auto-Not-For-Us: 78: [...] , ia32-libs, [...]
Also there is something that says ia32-libs is amd64 and ia64 only here:
https://buildd.debian.org/quinn-diff/sid/Packages-arch-specific
ia32-libs-i386 doesn't show up on the buildd at all:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ia32-libs-i386&suite=sid
Apparently ia32-libs-i386 is in the archive because it got uploaded directly as
a binary (not from a buildd):
http://packages.qa.debian.org/i/ia32-libs/news/20120630T094734Z.html
But the latest ia32-libs upload didn't include the ia32-libs-i386 binary in the
upload:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/i/ia32-libs/news/20120704T103209Z.html
Could you please fix the buildd's configuration to build the package, or upload
the prebuilt binary?
# apt-get install ia32-libs
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
ia32-libs : Depends: ia32-libs-i386
$ apt-cache policy ia32-libs
ia32-libs:
Installed: 20120102
Candidate: 20120701
Version table:
20120701 0
500 http://iota.nren.ro/debian/ unstable/main amd64 Packages
500 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ unstable/main amd64 Packages
*** 20120102 0
500 http://iota.nren.ro/debian/ testing/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
$ apt-cache policy ia32-libs-i386
ia32-libs-i386:i386:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 20120616
Version table:
20120616 0
500 http://iota.nren.ro/debian/ unstable/main i386 Packages
500 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ unstable/main i386 Packages
Thanks,
--Edwin
--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel: Linux 3.5.0-rc4
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
500 unstable iota.nren.ro
500 unstable ftp.de.debian.org
500 testing iota.nren.ro
--- Package information. ---
Package's Depends field is empty.
Package's Recommends field is empty.
Package's Suggests field is empty.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 04:37:10PM +0300, Török Edwin wrote:
> Package: buildd.debian.org
>
> FWIW ia32-libs-gtk is still not installable.
> ia32-libs was installable for quite some time now (thanks!), although its
> entry
> in Packages-arch-specific was still not updated.
>
> Will this be fixed for wheezy?
Not at all the business of the people you just reported that to.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
