Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 14:51:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing now because #304535 is not a bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Apr 2005 20:39:33 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 13 13:39:33 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c-adt-5.ataco.se (bixbite.opalsys.net) [213.115.168.248]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DLoe5-0001Em-00; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 13:39:33 -0700
Received: from ola by bixbite.opalsys.net with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DLoX9-0002z8-Cz; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 22:32:23 +0200
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 22:32:23 +0200
From: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: debarchiver questions regarding dscverify
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: debarchiver
Severity: minor
And I file this too as a bug.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:20:55PM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
...
> > > (4) A minor issue: if using debarchiver -so --scanall (with
> > > apt-ftparchive), I don't get all index files updated. My archive has
> >
> > Yes this is a known bug. I have thought of fixing that but I have
> > not done so yet. It is probably quite easy though. Please file a bug
> > and/or send me a patch if you want that feature. :)
> >
> > > unstable -> sid (main, contrib, non-free)
> > > experimental (main, contrib, non-free)
> > >
> > > but only sid/main and sid/contrib are updated with the --scanall option.
> > > I don't know why. Is it possible, that the '-' in 'non-free' is the
> > > reason, why it stops? If you need more info about this issue, please let
> > > me know.
> >
> > Maybe. I thought that --scanall did not really work with apt-ftparchive
> > functionality.
>
> At the moment, I use dpkg-scanpackages/dpkg-scansources to update
> index-files 4 times a day.
>
> Regards, Daniel
>
// Ola
--
--- Ola Lundqvist systemkonsult --- M Sc in IT Engineering ----
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 304535-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Oct 2005 12:50:30 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 15 05:50:30 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pop.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EQlUb-00014Y-00; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 05:50:29 -0700
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 15 Oct 2005 12:49:58 -0000
Received: from mail.fbn-dd.de (EHLO test.wgdd.de) [195.227.105.178]
by mail.gmx.net (mp030) with SMTP; 15 Oct 2005 14:49:58 +0200
X-Authenticated: #17381962
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=dl)
by test.wgdd.de with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1EQlVB-0003M7-00; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 14:51:05 +0200
Subject: closing now because #304535 is not a bug
From: Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: TU Dresden
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 14:51:04 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SBLXBL,
RCVD_IN_SBLXBL_OPM autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
This is not a bug. My first impression of the expected behaviour of
apt-ftparchive was wrong. The mentioned files were updated, because
binary-all was not empty (contained packages) and Packages needs to be
merged. I will close this bug now.
Regards, Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
