Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 07:17:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#126438: fixed in debiandoc-sgml-doc 1.1.17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Dec 2001 18:30:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 25 12:30:31 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cepheus.azstarnet.com [169.197.56.195] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 16IwLP-0000BG-00; Tue, 25 Dec 2001 12:30:31 -0600
Received: from Obsession.azstarnet.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [169.197.9.26])
        by cepheus.azstarnet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA26646
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 25 Dec 2001 11:30:28 -0700 (MST)
X-Sent-via: StarNet http://www.azstarnet.com/
Received: by Obsession.azstarnet.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 25 Dec 
2001 11:31:09 -0700
From: Chris Tillman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2001 11:31:09 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: pdflatex: nested tags and relative links
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: tetex-bin
Version:1.0.7+20001218-7

I noticed whenever a url link is nested inside a <file> tag, the
pdflatex output is incorrect and unlinked. If that can't be fixed, a
suggested workaround would be to have nsgmls generate an error or
warning.

Also, relative links which work fine when using debiandoc2html are
broken in the pdf format. If you click on one of these links, acrobat
reports a relative link not found error. I guess this is because the
pdf document is considered to stand by itself, and is not assumed to
be in a given directory like an html document is. Could a warning be
added to the pdflatex output when relative links are present? - so
this situation would be visible to the doc builder.

-- 
*------v--------- Installing Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 --------v------*
|      <http://www.debian.org/releases/woody/installmanual>      |
|   debian-imac (potato): <http://debian-imac.sourceforge.net>   |
|            Chris Tillman        [EMAIL PROTECTED]          |
|                   May the Source be with you                   |
*----------------------------------------------------------------*

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 126438-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Oct 2005 14:18:20 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 15 07:18:20 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EQmqP-0003E7-00; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 07:17:05 -0700
From: Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#126438: fixed in debiandoc-sgml-doc 1.1.17
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 07:17:05 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: debiandoc-sgml-doc
Source-Version: 1.1.17

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
debiandoc-sgml-doc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

debiandoc-sgml-doc_1.1.17.dsc
  to pool/main/d/debiandoc-sgml-doc/debiandoc-sgml-doc_1.1.17.dsc
debiandoc-sgml-doc_1.1.17.tar.gz
  to pool/main/d/debiandoc-sgml-doc/debiandoc-sgml-doc_1.1.17.tar.gz
debiandoc-sgml-doc_1.1.17_all.deb
  to pool/main/d/debiandoc-sgml-doc/debiandoc-sgml-doc_1.1.17_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated debiandoc-sgml-doc package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 22:09:31 +0900
Source: debiandoc-sgml-doc
Binary: debiandoc-sgml-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.1.17
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: DebianDoc-SGML Pkgs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 debiandoc-sgml-doc - Documentation for DebianDoc-SGML
Closes: 31654 102926 126438
Changes: 
 debiandoc-sgml-doc (1.1.17) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Added information for tags used commonly in many existing documents:
     <debiandoc>, <translator>, <copyrightsummary>, <heading>, <comment>
     tags. Closes: Bug#31654
     (other tags are rarely used.)
   * Mentioned debiandoc2* tools. Closes: Bug#102926
   * Documented file and url tag interaction issue. Closes: Bug#126438
   * Added information on the Docbook XML conversion method.
Files: 
 367c5d745e44966234b0661a575acebc 742 doc optional debiandoc-sgml-doc_1.1.17.dsc
 bff2a99f2e19ad5df1b750857e379a68 22167 doc optional 
debiandoc-sgml-doc_1.1.17.tar.gz
 2e4d5f02e1ddbb69fada586acaadd9e1 226958 doc optional 
debiandoc-sgml-doc_1.1.17_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDUPiR6A/EwagGHzIRAuuBAJ9LX5h11hgAwj2fIA8EB0HcgauPgQCffqhu
S0Wec8pWMwwqjw+geosXb+g=
=2Rhf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to