Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 17:16:31 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in 0.3.5.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Oct 2005 10:11:03 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 03 03:11:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mailservice.tudelft.nl [130.161.131.5] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EMNHj-0003mK-00; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 03:11:03 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by rav.antivirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 445C422EE87;
        Mon,  3 Oct 2005 12:10:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (kriek.st.ewi.tudelft.nl [130.161.158.119])
        by mx1.tudelft.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D3522EE96;
        Mon,  3 Oct 2005 12:10:27 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Tom Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: aptitude: "Exactly one filter must be provided as an argument to a 
filter
 policy" on startup
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 12:10:24 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at tudelft.nl
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: aptitude
Version: 0.3.4-1
Severity: minor

Every time I startup the aptitude GUI (either from just from running
'aptitude' at the command line, or via any of the commands) I get the
message "Exactly one filter must be provided as an argument to a filter policy"

Dropping the following line from my ~/.aptitude/config
        aptitude::UI::Default-Grouping 
"filter(missing),task,status,section(subdir,passthrough),section(topdir)";
fixes the problem. I've never touched that config file before today,
so I'm guessing that was automatically added by an earlier version of
aptitude?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (103, 'testing'), (102, 'unstable'), (99, 
'experimental'), (98, 'hoary'), (97, 'breezy')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages aptitude depends on:
ii  apt [libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6-3.1 0.6.41     Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii  libc6                         2.3.5-6    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1                       1:4.0.2-2  GCC support library
ii  libncursesw5                  5.4-9      Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libsigc++-2.0-0c2             2.0.10-3   type-safe Signal Framework for C++
ii  libstdc++6                    4.0.2-2    The GNU Standard C++ Library v3

Versions of packages aptitude recommends:
pn  aptitude-doc-en | aptitude-do <none>     (no description available)

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 331404-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2005 00:16:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 15 17:16:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp.vzavenue.net [66.171.59.140] (mirapoint)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EQwC1-0005l6-00; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 17:16:01 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain (244.173.171.66.subscriber.vzavenue.net 
[66.171.173.244])
        by smtp.vzavenue.net (MOS 3.4.8-GR)
        with ESMTP id DCH32139;
        Sat, 15 Oct 2005 20:15:56 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 17:16:31 -0700
From: Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed in 0.3.5.1-1
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9zSXsLTf0vkW971A"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Junkmail-Status: score=34/50, host=smtp.vzavenue.net
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 6


--9zSXsLTf0vkW971A
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Version: 0.3.5.1-1

  These bugs were fixed with the upload of 0.3.5.1-1 to experimental.

  Daniel

--9zSXsLTf0vkW971A
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDUZvfch6xsM7kSXgRAqAeAJwPe8ixNb5lBYQCws+JkrFD8/jvmQCg/cad
4ipVZBDS9bQIWTtWSMxO+xg=
=PsWm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--9zSXsLTf0vkW971A--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to