Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 17:16:31 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in 0.3.5.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Oct 2005 07:00:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 09 00:00:08 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 5301d.unt0.torres.l21.ma.zugschlus.de (torres.zugschlus.de)
[217.151.83.1] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EOVAF-0003FG-00; Sun, 09 Oct 2005 00:00:08 -0700
Received: from scyw00225.int.l21.ma.zugschlus.de
([192.168.130.43] helo=scyw00225.scy001.de ident=Debian-exim)
by torres.zugschlus.de with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
(Exim 4.54)
id 1EOVAD-0001Dg-Ir; Sun, 09 Oct 2005 09:00:06 +0200
Received: from mh by scyw00225.scy001.de with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1EOVAC-0000c8-OL; Sun, 09 Oct 2005 09:00:04 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: aptitude: please give option to allow installation of untrusted
packages
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 09:00:04 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Score: (-----) -5.9
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.2.15.9-6
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
in some cases, aptitude complains about untrusted packages even if
APT::Get::AllowUnauthenticated "true";
is set in apt.conf.d/90allow-unauthenticated.
This happens, for example, on systems that are testing the diff
package patch from Michael Vogt and Andreas Barth.
There should be an option to have aptitude accept these packages.
Additionally, aptitude should be more verbose in _what_ it doesn't
like with the packages or their signatures. Simply saying "untrusted
versions will be installed" isn't much help.
Greetings
Marc
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-rc1-scyw00225
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages aptitude depends on:
ii apt [libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6-3.1 0.6.41 Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii libc6 2.3.5-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-2 GCC support library
ii libncurses5 5.4-9 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii libsigc++-1.2-5c2 1.2.5-5 type-safe Signal Framework for C++
ii libstdc++6 4.0.2-2 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
Versions of packages aptitude recommends:
ii aptitude-doc-en [aptitude-doc 0.2.15.9-6 English manual for aptitude, a ter
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 332883-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2005 00:16:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 15 17:16:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp.vzavenue.net [66.171.59.140] (mirapoint)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EQwC1-0005l6-00; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 17:16:01 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain (244.173.171.66.subscriber.vzavenue.net
[66.171.173.244])
by smtp.vzavenue.net (MOS 3.4.8-GR)
with ESMTP id DCH32139;
Sat, 15 Oct 2005 20:15:56 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 17:16:31 -0700
From: Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed in 0.3.5.1-1
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9zSXsLTf0vkW971A"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Junkmail-Status: score=34/50, host=smtp.vzavenue.net
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 11
--9zSXsLTf0vkW971A
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Version: 0.3.5.1-1
These bugs were fixed with the upload of 0.3.5.1-1 to experimental.
Daniel
--9zSXsLTf0vkW971A
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDUZvfch6xsM7kSXgRAqAeAJwPe8ixNb5lBYQCws+JkrFD8/jvmQCg/cad
4ipVZBDS9bQIWTtWSMxO+xg=
=PsWm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--9zSXsLTf0vkW971A--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
