Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 17:16:31 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in 0.3.5.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Oct 2005 23:04:13 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 05 16:04:13 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from blabluga.hell.pl [62.121.102.27] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ENIJ2-0006Ww-00; Wed, 05 Oct 2005 16:04:13 -0700
Received: from arturcz by blabluga.hell.pl with local (Exim 4.53)
id 1ENIIx-00084A-M0; Thu, 06 Oct 2005 01:04:07 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Artur R. Czechowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Segmentation fault during downloading packages
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 01:04:07 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.3.4-1
Severity: important
Tags: experimental
Hello,
I've run aptitude in interactive mode, press <u> then <g>. After
downloading some packages I got a following SEGV:
(gdb) bt
#0 0xb7f03d50 in pkgSourceList::FindIndex ()
from /usr/lib/libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6.so.3.10
#1 0xb7f338fd in pkgAcqArchive::QueueNext ()
from /usr/lib/libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6.so.3.10
#2 0xb7f3ac19 in pkgAcqArchive::Failed ()
from /usr/lib/libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6.so.3.10
#3 0xb7f173f1 in pkgAcquire::Worker::RunMessages ()
from /usr/lib/libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6.so.3.10
#4 0xb7f1a369 in pkgAcquire::Worker::InFdReady ()
from /usr/lib/libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6.so.3.10
#5 0xb7f0f447 in pkgAcquire::RunFds ()
from /usr/lib/libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6.so.3.10
#6 0xb7f141ff in pkgAcquire::Run () from /usr/lib/libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6.so.3.10
#7 0x082b47d7 in std::map<std::string, std::string, std::less<std::string>,
std::allocator<std::pair<std::string const, std::string> > >::map ()
#8 0x08094335 in std::operator+<char, std::char_traits<char>,
std::allocator<char> > ()
#9 0x081612aa in std::operator+<char, std::char_traits<char>,
std::allocator<char> > ()
#10 0xb7e5ee40 in start_thread () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
#11 0xb7ce760e in clone () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
I rerun aptitude and run <g> some times and 4th or 5th try was successful.
So, I cannot reproduce this bug anymore today :)
Regards
Artur
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-arc4bl
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (charmap=ISO-8859-2)
Versions of packages aptitude depends on:
ii apt [libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6-3.1 0.6.41 Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii libc6 2.3.5-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-2 GCC support library
ii libncursesw5 5.4-9 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii libsigc++-2.0-0c2 2.0.16-1 type-safe Signal Framework for C++
ii libstdc++6 4.0.2-2 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
Versions of packages aptitude recommends:
ii aptitude-doc-en [aptitude 0.3.3-1.0.1arc English manual for aptitude, a ter
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 332345-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2005 00:16:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 15 17:16:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp.vzavenue.net [66.171.59.140] (mirapoint)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EQwC1-0005l6-00; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 17:16:01 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain (244.173.171.66.subscriber.vzavenue.net
[66.171.173.244])
by smtp.vzavenue.net (MOS 3.4.8-GR)
with ESMTP id DCH32139;
Sat, 15 Oct 2005 20:15:56 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 17:16:31 -0700
From: Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed in 0.3.5.1-1
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9zSXsLTf0vkW971A"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Junkmail-Status: score=34/50, host=smtp.vzavenue.net
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 9
--9zSXsLTf0vkW971A
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Version: 0.3.5.1-1
These bugs were fixed with the upload of 0.3.5.1-1 to experimental.
Daniel
--9zSXsLTf0vkW971A
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDUZvfch6xsM7kSXgRAqAeAJwPe8ixNb5lBYQCws+JkrFD8/jvmQCg/cad
4ipVZBDS9bQIWTtWSMxO+xg=
=PsWm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--9zSXsLTf0vkW971A--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
