Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:12:17 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334200: Acknowledgement (vim-common: syntax highlighting 
seems to be broken)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2005 10:06:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 16 03:06:45 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dslb-084-058-162-076.pools.arcor-ip.net 
(pluto.priv.schuetter.org) [84.58.162.76] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1ER5Ph-0001ed-00; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 03:06:45 -0700
Received: by pluto.priv.schuetter.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 366051F99B; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 12:06:13 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Joerg Schuetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: vim-common: syntax highlighting seems to be broken
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 12:06:12 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: vim-common
Version: 1:6.4-000+1
Severity: normal


By setting the syntax highlighting to automatic these error-lines apear:

Error detected while processing /usr/share/vim/vim64/syntax/syntax.vim:
line 42:
E216: No such group or event: filetypedetect BufRead

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.1-20050914-0
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages vim-common depends on:
ii  vim                          1:6.4-000+1 Vi IMproved - enhanced vi editor

vim-common recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 334200-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2005 11:12:21 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 16 04:12:21 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rollcage.inittab.de [194.150.191.146] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1ER6RB-0004tg-00; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 04:12:21 -0700
Received: by rollcage.inittab.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id F3775CEE2B; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:12:17 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:12:17 +0200
From: Norbert Tretkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg_Sch=FCtter?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#334200: Acknowledgement (vim-common: syntax highlighting seems 
to be broken)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

* J=F6rg Sch=FCtter wrote:
> Oh I'm so stuip. I forgot to update the "runtimepath" variable in
> /etc/vim/vimrc after the upgrade. Now it points to .../vim64 instead
> of .../vim63

In the future, just use /etc/vim/vimrc.local for your local settings.

Norbert


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to