Your message dated Fri, 31 Aug 2012 13:38:58 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#680226: lib{nss,pam}-ldapd: apt wants to remove them
on dist-upgrade in favour of lib{nss,pam}-ldap:i386
has caused the Debian Bug report #680226,
regarding lib{nss,pam}-ldapd: apt wants to remove them on dist-upgrade in
favour of lib{nss,pam}-ldap:i386
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
680226: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680226
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libnss-ldapd
Severity: important
Hi,
this situation is a bit weird, on an M-A enabled system
(debugging hindered a bit due to #680225), after upgrading
libnss-ldapd and libpam-ldapd to the latest version (or
even before doing that), a further dist-upgrade wants to
kill them and install libnss-ldap and libpam-ldap (the
nōn-“d” versions, which thus will not work due to #423252)
from i386 (WTF?).
root@${HOSTNAME}:~ # echo libnss-ldapd install | dpkg --set-selections
root@${HOSTNAME}:~ # echo libpam-ldapd install | dpkg --set-selections
root@${HOSTNAME}:~ # apt-get install libpam-ldapd libnss-ldapd
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
libnss-ldapd is already the newest version.
libpam-ldapd is already the newest version.
Starting
Starting 2
Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
root@${HOSTNAME}:~ # apt-get dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Starting
Starting 2
Investigating (0) libjack-jackd2-0 [ amd64 ] <
1.9.8~dfsg.4+20120529git007cdc37-1 > ( libs )
Broken libjack-jackd2-0:amd64 Conflicts on libjack-0.116 [ i386 ] < none > (
none )
Conflicts//Breaks against version 1:0.118+svn3796-7 for libjack0 but that is
not InstVer, ignoring
Considering libjack0:i386 2 as a solution to libjack-jackd2-0:amd64 7
Added libjack0:i386 to the remove list
Broken libjack-jackd2-0:amd64 Conflicts on libjack0 [ i386 ] < none ->
1:0.121.3+20120418git75e3e20b-2 > ( libs )
Considering libjack0:i386 2 as a solution to libjack-jackd2-0:amd64 7
Added libjack0:i386 to the remove list
Conflicts//Breaks against version 1:0.118+svn3796-7 for libjack0 but that is
not InstVer, ignoring
Fixing libjack-jackd2-0:amd64 via keep of libjack0:i386
Fixing libjack-jackd2-0:amd64 via keep of libjack0:i386
Investigating (0) libnss-ldapd [ amd64 ] < 0.8.10-1 > ( admin )
Broken libnss-ldapd:amd64 Conflicts on libnss-ldap [ i386 ] < none -> 264-2.3 >
( admin )
Considering libnss-ldap:i386 1 as a solution to libnss-ldapd:amd64 1
Removing libnss-ldapd:amd64 rather than change libnss-ldap:i386
Investigating (0) libpam-ldapd [ amd64 ] < 0.8.10-1 > ( admin )
Broken libpam-ldapd:amd64 Conflicts on libpam-ldap [ i386 ] < none -> 184-8.6 >
( admin )
Considering libpam-ldap:i386 3 as a solution to libpam-ldapd:amd64 1
Removing libpam-ldapd:amd64 rather than change libpam-ldap:i386
Investigating (0) ia32-libs-i386 [ i386 ] < none -> 20120616 > ( oldlibs )
Broken ia32-libs-i386:i386 Depends on libjack0 [ i386 ] < none ->
1:0.121.3+20120418git75e3e20b-2 > ( libs ) (>= 1:0.118+svn3796-7)
Considering libjack0:i386 2 as a solution to ia32-libs-i386:i386 -2
Holding Back ia32-libs-i386:i386 rather than change libjack0:i386
Investigating (1) ia32-libs [ amd64 ] < 20120102 -> 20120616 > ( oldlibs )
Broken ia32-libs:amd64 Depends on ia32-libs-i386 [ amd64 ] < none > ( none )
Considering ia32-libs-i386:i386 -2 as a solution to ia32-libs:amd64 3
Holding Back ia32-libs:amd64 rather than change ia32-libs-i386:amd64
Try to Re-Instate (2) ia32-libs:amd64
Done
Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
libnss-ldapd libpam-ldapd
The following NEW packages will be installed:
libnss-ldap:i386 libpam-ldap:i386
The following packages have been kept back:
ia32-libs
0 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 2 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
Need to get 216 kB of archives.
After this operation, 286 kB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? n
Abort.
This is on sid→sid.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
tarent solutions GmbH
Rochusstraße 2-4, D-53123 Bonn • http://www.tarent.de/
Tel: +49 228 54881-393 • Fax: +49 228 54881-314
HRB AG Bonn 5168 • USt-ID (VAT): DE122264941
Geschäftsführer: Boris Esser, Sebastian Mancke
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
tags 680226 + unreproducible
thanks
On Sat, 2012-07-07 at 17:02 +0200, Arthur de Jong wrote:
> Then again, I can't reproduce the problem that Thorsten reported. I've
> got both libnss-ldapd:i386 and libnss-ldapd:amd64 installed (both
> 0.8.10-1) in a chroot with dpkg:i386 1.16.7. The installation was done
> with apt-get (apt:i386 0.9.7.1) and went fine. Also apt-get
> dist-upgrade doesn't want to remove either of the packages.
Since I can't reproduce the problem with recent dpkg and apt (just
re-checked) I'm closing this bug report. Feel free to re-open if a
reproducible scenario can be provided.
Thanks.
--
-- arthur - [email protected] - http://people.debian.org/~adejong --
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
