Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 23:32:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321970: fixed in pkg-config 0.20-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Aug 2005 14:33:09 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 08 07:33:09 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no [129.241.93.19]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E28gf-0004wd-00; Mon, 08 Aug 2005 07:33:09 -0700
Received: from trofast.sesse.net ([129.241.93.32])
by cassarossa.samfundet.no with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1E28gT-0001py-1B; Mon, 08 Aug 2005 16:32:58 +0200
Received: from sesse by trofast.sesse.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1E28gR-00018R-00; Mon, 08 Aug 2005 16:32:55 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:
=?utf-8?q?pkg-config=3A_=E2=80=9Cchecking_for_DEPENDENCY=E2=80=9D_macro_i?=
=?utf-8?q?sn=27t_specific_enough?=
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 16:32:55 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: pkg-config
Version: 0.19-1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
When configuring something needing lots of packages, pkg-config will
give me something like
checking for DEPENDENCY... configure: error: Package
requirements (glib-2.0 >= 2.6.0 gtk+-2.0 >= 2.6.3
libxml-2.0 >= 2.6.12 gnome-vfs-2.0 >= 2.9.2
gnome-vfs-module-2.0 gconf-2.0 libpng)
were not met.
This is close to useless, considering that only one of those are
actually missing. pkg-config should tell which ones are missing, not
just âsomething is wrongâ.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.8
Locale: LANG=en_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages pkg-config depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.5-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
pkg-config recommends no packages.
-- debconf-show failed
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 321970-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2005 06:39:03 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 16 23:39:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EROXe-0001UW-00; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 23:32:14 -0700
From: Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#321970: fixed in pkg-config 0.20-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 23:32:14 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3
Source: pkg-config
Source-Version: 0.20-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
pkg-config, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
pkg-config_0.20-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/p/pkg-config/pkg-config_0.20-1.diff.gz
pkg-config_0.20-1.dsc
to pool/main/p/pkg-config/pkg-config_0.20-1.dsc
pkg-config_0.20-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/p/pkg-config/pkg-config_0.20-1_i386.deb
pkg-config_0.20.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/pkg-config/pkg-config_0.20.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated pkg-config package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:58 +0200
Source: pkg-config
Binary: pkg-config
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.20-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
pkg-config - manage compile and link flags for libraries
Closes: 318718 321961 321970
Changes:
pkg-config (0.20-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release
- Fixes segfault with --help and gcc4 (closes: #321961)
- New pkg.m4 uses --short-errors and spits out a more sensible error
when some dependencies aren't found. (closes: #321970)
* Install upstream ChangeLog (closes: #318718)
Files:
0afd26ad47638f3ba67f23aee85d4fde 586 devel optional pkg-config_0.20-1.dsc
0a4fadf7efc7aef284458f436ddfadba 969731 devel optional
pkg-config_0.20.orig.tar.gz
febd9f2f9af61821b847d0b511971691 4280 devel optional pkg-config_0.20-1.diff.gz
0038aa35886521f010c06d422aa00ee2 65114 devel optional
pkg-config_0.20-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDU0KLQSseMYF6mWoRApy4AJ0eRCddOb9yvVx45jCOd7BOiGXUuACgynfz
dPVReY9aUl3Q2kurun7z3kc=
=ZQZ8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
