Your message dated Fri, 21 Sep 2012 06:49:57 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: netsniff-ng, architecture list seems to be unnessacerally
restrictive.
has caused the Debian Bug report #688282,
regarding netsniff-ng, architecture list seems to be unnessacerally restrictive.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
688282: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688282
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: netsniff-ng
Severity: important.
Tags: patch
In 0.5.6-2 you made the following change
"Set archs to: i386, amd64, powerpc and sparc only as dependencies are
not available or missing on other than these archs."
Howver since then it seems the dependencies have become available in
testing on armhf, s390 and s390x, can you please
add theese to the architecture list.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
peter green wrote:
Howver since then it seems the dependencies have become available in
testing on armhf, s390 and s390x, can you please
add theese to the architecture list.
Sorry it seems I was mistaken, the runtime dependencies are satisfiable
on those architectures but the build-dependencies
are not.
--- End Message ---
