Your message dated Sat, 29 Sep 2012 10:20:50 -0700 with message-id <[email protected]> and subject line Re: Bug#689100: bugs.debian.org doesn't identify itself in Resent-From: (RFC 5322) has caused the Debian Bug report #689100, regarding bugs.debian.org doesn't identify itself in Resent-From: (RFC 5322) to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 689100: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689100 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: bugs.debian.org As per RFC 5322 §3.6.6, the Resent-From: header field should be set to the user who has “reintroduced [the message] into the transport system”: --cut: urn:ietf:rfc:5322 -- Resent fields are used to identify a message as having been reintroduced into the transport system by a user. […] […] The resent originator fields indicate the mailbox of the person(s) or system(s) that resent the message. […] --cut: urn:ietf:rfc:5322 -- Thus, I'd expect the messages passed via bugs.debian.org to bear Resent-From: [email protected]. On the contrary, the service duplicates From: as Resent-From: instead, like: --cut: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689099;msg=2;mbox=yes -- Resent-From: Joey Hess <[email protected]> … Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 01:13:21 -0400 From: Joey Hess <[email protected]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> --cut: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689099;msg=2;mbox=yes -- -- FSF associate member #7257
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---On Sat, 29 Sep 2012, Ivan Shmakov wrote: > Thus, I'd expect the messages passed via bugs.debian.org to > bear Resent-From: [email protected]. On the contrary, the > service duplicates From: as Resent-From: instead, like: Duplicating the Resent-From: is correct, because that's the user on whose behalf the system is forwarding the mail. The BTS also sets Resent-Sender to itself. Specifically: The resent originator fields indicate the mailbox of the person(s) or system(s) that resent the message. As with the regular originator fields, there are two forms: a simple "Resent-From:" form, which contains the mailbox of the individual doing the resending, and the more complex form, when one individual (identified in the "Resent- Sender:" field) resends a message on behalf of one or more others (identified in the "Resent-From:" field). We are doing the more complex form. Don Armstrong -- In all matters of government, the correct answer is usually: "Do nothing" -- Robert Heinlein _Time Enough For Love_ p428 http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
--- End Message ---

