Your message dated Tue, 18 Oct 2005 20:07:08 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#333232: nis: shadow entry missing in /var/yp/nicknames.. 
shadow support broken
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Oct 2005 00:19:57 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 10 17:19:57 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from biodev.ece.ucsb.edu [128.111.60.57] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EP7s5-0000Rp-00; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 17:19:57 -0700
Received: from kgk by biodev.ece.ucsb.edu with local (Exim 4.51)
        id 1EP7s5-00030T-14; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 17:19:57 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: kgk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: nis: shadow entry missing in /var/yp/nicknames.. shadow support broken
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 17:19:57 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: nis
Version: 3.13-2
Severity: normal


Installing NIS with shadow support did not
add the patch to /var/yp/nicknames
which stops shadow support from working.

*** nicknames.old       2005-10-10 17:15:55.000000000 -0700
--- nicknames   2005-10-10 17:09:15.000000000 -0700
***************
*** 6,8 ****
--- 6,9 ----
  services      services.byname
  aliases               mail.aliases
  ethers                ethers.byname
+ shadow                shadow.byname

-- Package-specific info:

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-9-em64t-p4-smp
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages nis depends on:
ii  debconf                       1.4.51     Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6                         2.3.5-4    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgdbm3                      1.8.3-2    GNU dbm database routines (runtime
ii  libslp1                       1.0.11a-2  OpenSLP libraries
ii  make                          3.80-9     The GNU version of the "make" util
ii  netbase                       4.21       Basic TCP/IP networking system
ii  portmap                       5-14       The RPC portmapper
ii  sysvinit                      2.86.ds1-1 System-V like init

nis recommends no packages.

-- debconf information excluded

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 333232-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Oct 2005 19:07:20 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 18 12:07:20 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk [80.68.93.111] (Debian-exim)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1ERwnw-00019x-00; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 12:07:20 -0700
Received: from 82-41-255-123.cable.ubr04.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.255.123] 
helo=lorien.sirena.org.uk)
        by cassiel.sirena.org.uk with esmtpsa 
(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
        (Exim 4.50)
        id 1ERwgk-0007dh-1S
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 18:59:59 +0000
Received: from raphaela (raphaela.sirena.org.uk [192.168.56.10])
        by lorien.sirena.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97A542AD32
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 20:07:09 +0100 (BST)
Received: by raphaela (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 330D4FAB5B; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 20:07:08 +0100 (BST)
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 20:07:08 +0100
From: Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#333232: nis: shadow entry missing in /var/yp/nicknames.. 
shadow support broken
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Cookie: Reality does not exist -- yet.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 12:45:53PM -0700, kristian kvilekval wrote:

> I'll drop the bug report.

OK.

--=20
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."

--bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iQCVAwUBQ1VH2A2erOLNe+68AQLNhQP/Xq96lYWxosR86j/pF/ekAGb6aM9yuZDJ
fYWMgUoPezq1cHR9V6bjiw8gw9at8ZG9L4HriP20Q4oJG/b0Wv1BbbF0fHwhpihL
S9GdfF+uoif0pg3bjpv+m6lsX1ZGRNEqKaPm/1QMLkDBjNK3/Kcvzk/73USSZDQP
XnxFafEc5Qo=
=+xY9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to