Your message dated Sat, 22 Dec 2012 00:48:04 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#639610: pciutils should not be built on s390
has caused the Debian Bug report #639610,
regarding pciutils should not be built on s390
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
639610: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=639610
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: buildd.debian.org
Severity: normal
s390 systems can never have a PCI bus, so pciutils are useless there.
See #639439.
Note that this will break some reverse-dependencies. But those
packages must already be broken on s390 anyway, or else those
dependencies should actually be recommendations.
Ben.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
tag 639610 + wontfix
thanks
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 05:16:12PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> s390 systems can never have a PCI bus, so pciutils are useless there.
> See #639439.
>
> Note that this will break some reverse-dependencies. But those
> packages must already be broken on s390 anyway, or else those
> dependencies should actually be recommendations.
s390 seems to grow PCI support at the moment[1]. So pciutils might actually
get useful in jessie.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pci/msg18651.html
--- End Message ---
