Your message dated Fri, 21 Oct 2005 10:21:06 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 07:47:47 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 00:47:47 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 213-133-100-49.clients.your-server.de (mail.biedermanns.com)
[213.133.100.49]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EHzKV-0007NJ-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 00:47:47 -0700
Received: from lmlo.sil.at ([213.235.212.193]
helo=tausendmorgenwald.gwendoline.at)
by mail.biedermanns.com with esmtpsa
(Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.44 #1 (Debian))
id 1EHzUM-0004vE-CA
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:57:59 +0200
Received: from alfie by tausendmorgenwald.gwendoline.at with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1EHzK7-0003IH-Ta
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:47:24 +0200
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:47:22 +0200
From: Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libfbclient1: long description lacks everything
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Editor: Vi Improved <http://www.vim.org/>
X-Signature-Color: cyan
X-Signature-Prg: sigd/0.10.4 (Perl) <http://alfie.ist.org/projects/sigd/>
X-Face: "`Q5\Ix+YG'{KDq<>5mcZL8Sp7$[L|%#^MSk'{Qpp"J8.<RP*P9<{{6$8%_~*:6c{)<;e:s
!:C2%IH-5:GT<,Sf3Xx}di,JDbDRH/;-eb{n`VSi*}-R2,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
{3w}E7d}+GN<|v=gDc;.c(xiy{Og_=2cy)T1J"Lu}y6Onsr
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: libfbclient1
Version: 1.5.2-7
Severity: important
Justification: Policy 3.4.2.
Hi!
I'm sorry, but the long description of libfbclient1 and libfbembed1
aren't meant serious, are they? The package description has to make
sense on its own, not reference a different package's description.
Pretty please (with sugar on top) put a sensible long description into
the library packages. Especially for libraries that aren't bound to a
single package (in which case it doesn't make much sense to package them
seperately).
Especially since I don't see anything in the referenced package's
description that would help me understand what the library package is
for.
Besides, quick side note, why is the library not in libs but in misc
section?
So long,
Alfie
--
* Rename template.ru to template.ru
-- Tollef Fog Heen, changelog.Debian for bsdmainutils (5.20020211-7)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 329330-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Oct 2005 07:22:39 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 21 00:22:39 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from fiona.creditreform.bg [212.36.1.3]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ESrEc-0002hr-00; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:22:39 -0700
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=amavis)
by fiona.creditreform.bg with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1ESrEZ-0002uj-Va; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 10:22:36 +0300
Received: from fiona.creditreform.bg ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (fiona [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
id 10486-05; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 10:22:35 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from pc1.creditreform.bg ([192.168.110.32])
by fiona.creditreform.bg with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1ESrEZ-0002th-Rm; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 10:22:35 +0300
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 10:21:06 +0300
From: Damyan Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed in unstable
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="------------enig48B0A87452E5FC557279C735"
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at creditreform.bg
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig48B0A87452E5FC557279C735
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi,
This bug is fixed in unstable.
It was not closed automatically by the upload due to miscommunication with my
sponsor. Sorry.
dam
--
Damyan Ivanov Creditreform Bulgaria
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.creditreform.bg/
phone: +359(2)928-2611, 929-3993 fax: +359(2)920-0994
mob. +359(88)856-6067 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/Gaim
--------------enig48B0A87452E5FC557279C735
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDWJbiHqjlqpcl9jsRAt+OAKCnitAPJOyhrYS78mEPMSJaps3j3gCeLtj8
LtE4XS0UalTqI0XEpcimYp8=
=yY9Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enig48B0A87452E5FC557279C735--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
