Your message dated Tue, 08 Jan 2013 15:47:30 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#693220: fixed in build-essential 11.6
has caused the Debian Bug report #693220,
regarding Add crossbuild-essential support
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
693220: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693220
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: build-essential
Version: 11.5
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch

Following on from discussion in this thread
http://lists.debian.org/debian-embedded/2012/06/msg00030.html

The cross-build-essential package has been developed some more and
tested in Quantal for arm64 bootstrap, and armel and armhf builds. It
works nicely. We definitely want to start using this.

The latest code is available at: 
http://people.debian.org/~wookey/bootstrap/ubunturepo/pool/main/c/cross-build-essential/

That code was carefully developed on top of build-essential so that
they could be easily merged into that one package if so desired. Feedback,
particularly from the maintainer, about whether this is desireable, or
should be uploaded as a separate package would be helpful. The above
thread didn't generate any on that point.

I can't actually think of any real reasons why it should be a
seaparate package. Thinking about build-essential:<arch>,
and crossbuild-essential-<arch> together seems to make sense and I
don't expect much churn in either package once toolchains are stable. 

It takes moments to build so the large increase in number of binary
packages is not an issue. 

On the other hand it's dead easy to just upload it as a new package
and let them diverge. This doesn't do any real harm but seems bit lazy
to me.

The existing code is set up for Ubuntu cross-toolchains at the moment,
but this fundamental question of whether it is one or two source
packages should be considered here, I think. 

Build-essential+cross-build-essential is always likely to have some
Debian/Ubuntu difference.

If the build-essential maintainer is happy to merge them then I'll
tidy up the Debian code for an upload. 

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.6
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32.33-kvm-i386-20111128-dirty (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages build-essential depends on:
ii  dpkg-dev                      1.15.8.13  Debian package development tools
ii  g++                           4:4.4.5-1  The GNU C++ compiler
ii  gcc                           4:4.4.5-1  The GNU C compiler
ii  libc6-dev [libc-dev]          2.11.3-4   Embedded GNU C Library: Developmen
ii  make                          3.81-8     An utility for Directing compilati

build-essential recommends no packages.

build-essential suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: build-essential
Source-Version: 11.6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
build-essential, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matthias Klose <[email protected]> (supplier of updated build-essential package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 16:33:55 +0100
Source: build-essential
Binary: build-essential crossbuild-essential-arm64 crossbuild-essential-armhf 
crossbuild-essential-i386
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 11.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matthias Klose <[email protected]>
Changed-By: Matthias Klose <[email protected]>
Description: 
 build-essential - Informational list of build-essential packages
 crossbuild-essential-arm64 - Informational list of cross-build-essential 
packages
 crossbuild-essential-armhf - Informational list of cross-build-essential 
packages
 crossbuild-essential-i386 - Informational list of cross-build-essential 
packages
Closes: 603386 693220
Changes: 
 build-essential (11.6) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Update Standards-Version to 3.9.4.
   * Build-depend on python3 instead of python.
   * Update make-esslist.sh to consider ports archives and distros.
     Closes: #603386.
   * Update essential packages lists.
   * Build crossbuild-essential-<arch> packages for architectures
     provided in debian/cross-targets (currently all commented out).
     Closes: #693220.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 f54f431731b7cfb1cf1b37a5c86ab8199f95647f 1069 build-essential_11.6.dsc
 afa098b12be62ad60b999338895035c059e11f3d 63657 build-essential_11.6.tar.gz
 0a46e32793b0cf952860b7eec2d263d53c5f9515 7358 build-essential_11.6_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 2e83f5fc955d153e24859170fd1e08a4028a7dac1e5f5414a496e137ef929895 1069 
build-essential_11.6.dsc
 bb43615452c54be190e484a281ec5cb4fc9d2050303ea47530f78880e522f1dc 63657 
build-essential_11.6.tar.gz
 e407a5cf73aa967a47c1337b7b6dd67590e26cc114896ac0cceb14a616428f60 7358 
build-essential_11.6_amd64.deb
Files: 
 3a7a543691ce1c6741a7a6878de71019 1069 devel optional build-essential_11.6.dsc
 3ba251f07eb9b183bd448d0adf50e619 63657 devel optional 
build-essential_11.6.tar.gz
 6ca434686efb96f984ff157c9dcd1377 7358 devel optional 
build-essential_11.6_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlDsPLUACgkQStlRaw+TLJxmJwCgiqgsyiuzBP22AGHrW5XxLEHl
1F4An1bysiqPwFHY8uYkW/LOWax8Db83
=inPf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to