Your message dated Sun, 3 Feb 2013 19:02:10 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#699672: smbfs: smbmount on fuse
possibility
has caused the Debian Bug report #699672,
regarding smbfs: smbmount on fuse possibility
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
699672: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699672
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: smbfs
Version: 2:4.5-2+squeeze1
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
alternatively to smbfs, I would like to propose that smbmount could be used
with fuse.
smbclient and smbmount rock really. it works well, and you can use
creditentials.
- A .smbclient
Please could add a possibility to "fuse-d" user can mount the samba shares to
~/samba
without asking the admin to add their names/paras into /etc/fstab or a sudo.
Fuse would be ideal for smbmount abnd ~/.bashrc to automatically mount it,
though bit unsecured.
Kind regards
I could find furthermore that you must have root or fstab access for that. what
about fuse?
If you want normal user to be able to mount network share such as samba/cifs or
nfs...
you can add the following to the very end of /etc/sudoers file and restart.
# allow members of CDROM group to mount without prompting for root password
%cdrom ALL = NOPASSWD:NOEXEC: /bin/mount, /bin/umount, /sbin/mount.cifs,
/sbin/mount.nfs
then add "sudo mount" etc etc to the users mount script.
example of samba mount
sudo mount.cifs //NetworkDrive/"Folder" "MountPoint" -o
ip=NetworkServerIPaddress,username="$UN",password="$PW",nounix,noserverino,file_mode=0777,dir_mode=0777
It will NOT ask them for the root password, as the sudoers file stops them from
needing it.
this works great for me..
The way I see it, if they have cdrom permissions and are sitting at my PC..
I trust them enough to mount a network share.
uPlease advise if it's a gaping hole in my security.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.3
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages smbfs depends on:
ii cifs-utils 2:4.5-2+squeeze1 Common Internet File System utilit
smbfs recommends no packages.
smbfs suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Quoting yellowprotoss ([email protected]):
> Package: smbfs
> Version: 2:4.5-2+squeeze1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hello,
>
> alternatively to smbfs, I would like to propose that smbmount could be used
> with fuse.
>
> smbclient and smbmount rock really. it works well, and you can use
> creditentials.
Please send such wishlist bug reports to upstream development lists
and have them discussed there. I don't think that the Debian BTS is
the right place for this.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
