Your message dated Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:05:17 +0200
with message-id
<caljhhg_qdrdrd-arpotz3e0v4k1515dv6ngyvlwuehth1gd...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#629963 libgd2-xpm-dev: Please Depends/Build-Depends on
libjpeg-dev, not libjpeg62-dev
has caused the Debian Bug report #629963,
regarding libgd2-xpm-dev: Please Depends/Build-Depends on libjpeg-dev, not
libjpeg62-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
629963: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629963
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libgd2-xpm-dev
Version: 2.0.36~rc1~dfsg-5.1
Severity: important
Hello GD,
There is an upcoming libjpeg transition from libjpeg62 to libjpeg8.
As mentionned on debian-devel-announce[1], please update libgd2-xpm-dev to
Depends and/or Build-Depends on libjpeg-dev instead of libjpeg62-dev.
The following Depends was found:
libgd2-xpm-dev :Depends: libjpeg62-dev
libgd2-noxpm-dev :Depends: libjpeg62-dev
(Please also check the Build-Depends)
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2010/02/msg00006.html
Cheers,
--
Bill. <[email protected]>
Imagine a large red swirl here.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.0.36~rc1~dfsg-6.1
This has fixed itself somewhere along the M-A transition.
O.
--
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]>
--- End Message ---
