Your message dated Sun, 05 May 2013 09:15:24 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line re: m-tx has very limited architecture list, making
texlive-full uninstallable on many architectures
has caused the Debian Bug report #706144,
regarding m-tx has very limited architecture list, making texlive-full
uninstallable on many architectures
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
706144: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706144
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: m-tx
Severity: important
A bug was reported by a raspbian user about texlive-full being
uninstable due to m-tx not being available. Taking a closer look
revealed that the reason for this was that m-tx declares an explicit
architecture list with only a handful of architectures. So texlive-full
ends up uninstallable on most debian architectures.
Is there a good reason for this? (for example inline assembly with no
generic C implementation available) if so please document what it is in
the bug report and if applicable please review the architecture list
matches what is currently supported, if not please change the
architecture to any.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.60d-5.1
Sorry forgot to include a Closes: in the changelog.
--- End Message ---
